Monday, July 3, 2017
Saturday, July 1, 2017
Time ranks FSU
http://time.com/money/best-colleges/rankings/best-colleges-in-the-south/
These colleges notched the best combination of educational quality, affordability, and high-earning alumni in the South.
http://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/#!/2017/07/best-southern-schools.html
| Nat'l Rank | college | location | Median SAT/ACT score | Est. price 2017-18 without aid | Est. price 2017-18 with avg. grant | % who get need-based grants | % who get merit grants | Early career earnings |
| 11 | U. Virginia | Charlottesville, VA | 1360/31 | $31,221 | $15,702 | 27% | 2% | $58,000 |
| 12 | Rice | Houston, TX | 1470/33 | $62,697 | $24,259 | 37% | 1% | $63,100 |
| 15 | Vanderbilt | Nashville, TN | 1510/33 | $67,074 | $24,772 | 45% | 20% | $57,900 |
| 16 | Ga Tech | Atlanta, GA | 1400/32 | $30,660 | $13,755 | 38% | 25% | $65,600 |
| 18 | U. Florida | Gainesville, FL | 1270/29 | $21,813 | $15,779 | 33% | 39% | $49,800 |
| 23 | Va Tech | Blacksburg, VA | 1220/NA | $26,241 | $19,870 | 31% | 15% | $57,400 |
| 31 | U. Texas | Austin, TX | 1290/29 | $27,789 | $18,755 | 33% | 12% | $53,900 |
| 34 | Texas A & M | College Station, TX | 1200/27 | $26,153 | $14,821 | 39% | 3% | $55,000 |
| 50 | NC State | Raleigh, NC | 1250/28 | $23,647 | $14,661 | 44% | 6% | $52,500 |
| 60 | UNC | Chapel Hill, NC | 1320/30 | $25,706 | $11,648 | 41% | 2% | $46,800 |
| 61 | Clemson | Clemson, SC | 1250/29 | $29,371 | $17,952 | 37% | 23% | $54,100 |
| 62 | U. Georgia | Athens, GA | 1240/28 | $26,535 | $14,342 | 40% | 7% | $47,800 |
| 64 | Duke | Durham, NC | 1460/33 | $70,898 | $22,999 | 40% | 4% | $62,000 |
| 118 | Wake Forest | Winston Salem, NC | NA/NA | $69,245 | $26,923 | 31% | 18% | $51,400 |
| 162 | Arizona St | Tempe, AZ | 1150/25 | $27,137 | $13,924 | 52% | 5% | $49,900 |
| 180 | Oklahoma | Norman, OK | 1200/26 | $26,563 | $18,262 | 27% | 25% | $50,000 |
| 194 | UTEP | El Paso, TX | 940/20 | $22,911 | $5,868 | 67% | 13% | $42,200 |
| 195 | U. Houston | Houston, TX | 1150/25 | $26,124 | $15,184 | 51% | 3% | $52,400 |
| 246 | LSU | Baton Rouge, LA | 1120/26 | $27,186 | $14,636 | 38% | 1% | $48,200 |
| 251 | Florida St | Tallahassee, FL | 1210/28 | $23,301 | $18,045 | 48% | 34% | $44,100 |
| 255 | Oklahoma St | Stillwater, OK | 1110/25 | $23,552 | $15,360 | 40% | 3% | $47,000 |
| 261 | Texas Tech | Lubbock, TX | 1100/25 | $23,835 | $16,205 | 42% | 16% | $51,700 |
| 261 | Louisiana Tech | Ruston, LA | 1070/24 | $20,480 | $9,617 | 51% | 12% | $48,300 |
| 277 | U. Miami | Coral Gables, FL | 1320/30 | $65,804 | $38,280 | 13% | 18% | $51,300 |
| 325 | Tulane | New Orleans, LA | 1320/31 | $70,063 | $34,641 | 35% | 9% | $46,200 |
| 325 | U. Arizona | Tucson, AZ | NA/NA | $27,178 | $16,838 | 48% | 4% | $50,800 |
| 333 | Southern Methodist | Dallas, TX | 1310/30 | $71,733 | $39,530 | 24% | 21% | $51,900 |
| 344 | Mississippi St | Mississippi State, MS | 1130/25 | $24,202 | $16,660 | 54% | 5% | $47,000 |
Time's Sources: U.S. Department of Education, Peterson's, PayScale.com, MONEY/College Measures calculations.
Thursday, June 29, 2017
FSU reconsidering asian massage parlor ads....
https://floridastate.rivals.com/news/fsu-considering-modifications-to-controversial-doak-campbell-billboards
Through a university spokesman, FSU Athletics Director Stan Wilcox confirmed to Warchant on Thursday that the Seminoles are reconsidering the look of advertisements on the back of the stadium's new south end zone scoreboard.
"We are in the process of evaluating modifications that might be made to the recent graphics," Wilcox said.
https://floridastate.rivals.com/news/has-fsu-gone-too-far-commercializing-doak-campbell-stadium-
. The recent gaudy ads unveiled on the back of south end zone scoreboard, which are clearly visible behind the Unconquered Statue, have altered this feeling. There’s little doubt now that FSU has stepped over the precipice and is quickly falling down a slippery slope. Unlike the north end zone scoreboard, or the various ads around Doak Campbell or the Tucker Center, this is the first time that an advertisement is clearly more prominent compared to accompanying Florida State logos or photos.
Florida State’s administration has a responsibility to keep IMG in check and balance the need for advertising against college tradition and pageantry. That clearly wasn’t done with the most recent additions to the south end zone scoreboard. But as Ira Schoffel first reported in Thursday’s story, FSU is reevaluating these ads and will hopefully come up with a less obtrusive alternative such as the one suggested by a poster on the Tribal Council.
Hopefully, FSU will take a step back from this advertising tipping point and will leave it to somebody else to become the leader in the commercialization of college sports.
FSU finishes 13 in Directors Cup
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/nacda/sports/directorscup/auto_pdf/2016-17/misc_non_event/D1final2017.pdf
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/florida-state-seminoles/chopping-block/
http://floridastate.247sports.com/Bolt/FSU-finishes-in-top-15-of-Directors-Cup-53377367
http://www.tallahassee.com/story/sports/college/fsu/2017/06/29/florida-state-finishes-13-th-directors-cup/439346001/
They charged to the front after an excellent spring where eight of the nine teams competing finished in the Top-20 including three Top-10 finishes by beach volleyball (4), baseball (5), and softball (9).
The Seminoles were the second highest rated team in the ACC behind No. 5 North Carolina. Notre Dame, which is in the ACC for every sport besides football, was the only other ACC team in the Top-25 at No. 23.
FSU finished second in the state of Florida as well. UF led the state at No. 3. Miami (56), South Florida (90), Central Florida (97), and Florida Gulf Coast (100) were the other programs from the state to finish in the Top-100.
Revenue Gap article
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/florida-gators/
Another day, another national championship for the Florida Gators.
Yawn.
Beware, Florida State. It’s only a matter of time before UF’s football team is paying, er, playing for national championships, too. Ditto, the basketball team.
You see, nobody in this part of the country buys, er, wins national championships like UF does.
This column is not meant so much to prop up the Gators for being an all-sports giant, although they certainly are. After coach Kevin O’Sullivan’s baseball team beat LSU 6-1 to win UF’s first College World Series championship Tuesday night, UF became the only program since integration that has baseball, football and basketball national championships in its trophy case.
This column is meant more as a warning for Florida State and its fellow ACC members. Beware of the Gators and their filthy rich Southeastern Conference brethren, who — with all of their SEC Network money — could be on the verge of spending you into irrelevance.
Granted, at this point in time, the ACC has never looked better with national championships in both football (Clemson beat SEC goliath Alabama) and basketball (North Carolina beat Gonzaga), but don’t kid yourself: The SEC is earning money and spending it at an alarming rate.
And coming soon: Another $60 million for a stand-alone football Taj Mahal that surely will be filled with smoothie bars, waterfalls, laser-tag studios and all sorts of amenities to entice the recruits who don’t go to Alabama.
“I think the SEC Network and the money and exposure it has provided has been a huge factor,” says UF basketball coach Mike White, who took his team to within one victory of the Final Four in his second season. “The network is providing an incredible amount of money for our institutions to spend on facilities. When you look around the league, there are renovations everywhere.”
According to the most recent numbers, ACC revenues dropped during the 2015-16 fiscal year and the conference offered the lowest annual payout per school ($23.8 million) of any of the Power 5 conferences. Compare that to the SEC’s bowl and TV payout of $40.42 million and then do the math. If this massive discrepancy were to continue over a 10-year period, the Gators would make $160 million more than the Seminoles. That’s a lot of plush facilities to entice wide-eyed recruits.
And we’re just talking about bowl and TV revenue. In total earnings, the SEC averages $30 million per school more than the ACC. You simply cannot continue operating at such a financial deficit and expect to consistently compete.
If you really want to put it in perspective, think about it this way: The discrepancy between the SEC and ACC payouts is almost as large as the discrepancy between the ACC and the American Athletic Conference payouts. In other words, when it comes to financial comparisons, the Gators are to FSU what FSU is to UCF.
The hope, of course, is that when ESPN launches the ACC Network in 2019 that FSU and its league partners can begin to close the gap. But in this era of cord-cutting among viewers and budget-cutting at ESPN, the question is: How profitable will the ACC Network be?
Obviously, it’s not going to be as successful as the SEC Network, which, according to AL.com, has been valued at nearly $5 billion — four times more than even the highly successful Big Ten Network.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s not like the ACC is hurting for cash; it’s just that the SEC has it to burn.
The bottom line is the bottom line.
In sports as in politics, those contestants and candidates with the most money usually win.
Labels:
ACC Finances
Wednesday, June 28, 2017
ACC Football RX: ESPN Distribution Contracts, Update 2017-06-29
Great breakdown by ACC Football RX
https://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2017/06/espn-distribution-contracts-update-2017.html?showComment=1498678629808#!/2017/06/espn-distribution-contracts-update-2017.html
According to Sports Business Daily...
ESPN Contract Renewals with TV Distributors
* in millions
see also: http://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2016/07/acc-network-distribution-hurdle.html
BOTTOM LINE: According to the best information I can find, ESPN will be a chance to negotiate carriage of the ACC Network for at least 30.1 million subscribers by 2019, and up to 66.1 million by 2022 at the latest. Keep in mind that there are another 30.2 million subscribers out there with unknown renewal dates for their carriers - some or all of those could be on board by 2019. So to keep it simple, let's say the ACC Network will launch with somewhere between 30 and 96 million subscribers.
Let's further assume an average of around $0.70 each (a little less than the SEC Network). That translates into
Est. 30M to 96M X $0.70/month = $21.0M to $67.2M per month
$21M to $67M per month X 12 months = $252.0M to $806.4M per year
Assume half of that goes to ESPN, leaving $126M to $403.2M
divided 15 ways* comes to $8.4M to $26.9M per team
* if you prefer assigning a share to the conference, divide 16 ways: $7.9M to $25.2M each
Of course, I'm not accounting for the costs of production because I have no idea what those are.
If you think the ACC Network only gets an average of $0.35 per month, just divide those numbers in half -- it's still a lot of money!
https://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2017/06/espn-distribution-contracts-update-2017.html?showComment=1498678629808#!/2017/06/espn-distribution-contracts-update-2017.html
According to Sports Business Daily...
Between now and the ACC Network’s planned launch in 2019, ESPN also has affiliate deals coming up with Verizon Fios (at the end of 2018), Charter (mid-2019) and AT&T (late 2019)Add to that some information I was able to Google about current subscribers for Sling, DirectTV Now and Playstation Vue, along with information in my previous post on ACC Network distribution, and we come up with an updated table of ESPN distributors:
ESPN Contract Renewals with TV Distributors
| Distributor | Renewal | subscribers* |
| Comcast | 2021 | 22.4 |
| DirectTV | 20.8 | |
| Charter | 2019 | 17.3 |
| DISH | 2022 | 13.6 |
| Verizon/FiOS | 2019 | 4.7 |
| ATT Uverse | 2019 | 4.5 |
| Cox | ? | 4.5 |
| Altice | 2017 | 3.6 |
| Frontier | ? | 1.3 |
| Sling TV | ? | 1 |
| Mediacom | ? | 0.8 |
| DirectTV Now | ? | 0.4 |
| PS Vue | ? | 0.4 |
| Windstream | ? | 0.36 |
| RCN | ? | 0.33 |
| Cable ONE | ? | 0.3 |
| Hulu | ? | ? |
| YouTube TV | ? | ? |
see also: http://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2016/07/acc-network-distribution-hurdle.html
BOTTOM LINE: According to the best information I can find, ESPN will be a chance to negotiate carriage of the ACC Network for at least 30.1 million subscribers by 2019, and up to 66.1 million by 2022 at the latest. Keep in mind that there are another 30.2 million subscribers out there with unknown renewal dates for their carriers - some or all of those could be on board by 2019. So to keep it simple, let's say the ACC Network will launch with somewhere between 30 and 96 million subscribers.
Let's further assume an average of around $0.70 each (a little less than the SEC Network). That translates into
Est. 30M to 96M X $0.70/month = $21.0M to $67.2M per month
$21M to $67M per month X 12 months = $252.0M to $806.4M per year
Assume half of that goes to ESPN, leaving $126M to $403.2M
divided 15 ways* comes to $8.4M to $26.9M per team
* if you prefer assigning a share to the conference, divide 16 ways: $7.9M to $25.2M each
Of course, I'm not accounting for the costs of production because I have no idea what those are.
If you think the ACC Network only gets an average of $0.35 per month, just divide those numbers in half -- it's still a lot of money!
NCAA National Championships
RedditCFB @RedditCFB 2h2 hours ago
2016-17 D1 NCAA (+ Football) National Championships earned by each school.


Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)