College football spending, ranked
Football Spending
"Bizjournal/Memphis posted a slideshow titled "College football spending, ranked". For those of you who hate clicking through all those slides, here are their numbers (ACC teams + ND highlighted):
Rank | Team | Spending |
1 | Alabama | $41,558,058 |
2 | Auburn | $36,306,282 |
3 | Notre Dame | $32,373,258 |
4 | Wisconsin | $31,811,280 |
5 | Texas Christian | $31,199,116 |
6 | Arkansas | $29,861,957 |
7 | Penn State | $28,637,144 |
8 | Tennessee | $27,850,351 |
9 | Texas | $27,675,403 |
10 | Georgia | $26,325,257 |
11 | Louisiana State | $25,822,306 |
12 | Florida | $25,704,553 |
13 | Ole Miss | $25,210,875 |
14 | South Carolina | $24,975,716 |
15 | Miami | $24,672,810 |
16 | Virginia Tech | $24,596,694 |
17 | Oklahoma | $24,533,905 |
18 | Washington | $23,801,655 |
19 | Arizona State | $23,509,311 |
20 | Florida State | $23,427,950 |
21 | Louisville | $23,186,536 |
22 | California | $23,071,010 |
23 | Michigan | $23,061,374 |
24 | Southern California | $23,049,962 |
25 | Ohio State | $22,984,985 |
BOTTOM LINE: This looks about right. The teams which we know are spending a lot on football are on this list. The only ACC team I was expecting to see but don't is Clemson (maybe they are #26?).
How bad do you want it?"
RE: College football spending, ranked.
03.) University of Notre Dame - $32,373,258
15.) University of Miami - $24,672,810
16.) Virginia Tech University - $24,596,694
20.) Florida State University - $23,427,950
21.) University of Louisville - $23,186,536
Marge Schott
9/4/14
"Seems about right. Surprised no Clemson though?
FSU doesn't have to travel all that far to recruit and much of the talent is in-state. So recruiting trips aren't as expensive for coaches or recruits (officials) and tuition isn't typically high.
A school like ND who MUST recruit nationally and has higher tuition as a private school will spend more on football. But maybe that's all spelled out in the link (didn't click it). "
"For the state schools it really shows how much these are investing in the football program. For ND and Miami, its much tougher, they have to pay for private tuition rates which is much higher than state schools.
It's amazing that we didn't see the rest of the ACC teams, ( I get it that the private schools don't have to report (ie. Duke, Wake, BC and Syracuse), but look ND was transparent.
Since it's only the top 25 it's not that amazing. Also, EVERY SCHOOLS reports these figures to the Feds each year. It's all available online at http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/ . "
"nzmorange Wrote: This list would be way more meaningful if they took tuition out.
Athletically Related Student Aid, Men's Teams
FSU: $5.3M
Miami: $8.5M
ND: $11.0M "
lumberpack
9/4/14
"For the state schools it really shows how much these are investing in the football program. For ND and Miami, its much tougher, they have to pay for private tuition rates which is much higher than state schools.
It's amazing that we didn't see the rest of the ACC teams, ( I get it that the private schools don't have to report (ie. Duke, Wake, BC and Syracuse), but look ND was transparent.
It's all right here: http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/InstList.aspx
Duke $19.2 million
Syracuse $22.6 million
BC $19.7 million
Miami $24.6 million
Pitt $18.9 million
WF $14 million
Clemson $ 20 million
UNC $16 million
NCSU $ 18.4 million
UVA $21.4 million "
No comments:
Post a Comment