Re: SEC network scores big - ACC?
moz9
"For a conference that has won 3 BCS games, a national title, and has had numerous award winners, NFL draftees all in the last two years, I'll stand by my statement. You're so obssessed with the SEC that you can't even see the facts straight. "
"You are a one hit (year) wonder, thanks to FSU.
You do realize that the ACC:
- was an abysmal 5-13 in BCS play with a winning percentage of .278;
- the ACC went 5-6 in Bowl play last season where four of the six losses were by double digits. Of the three wins, only one came against a power 5 conference team;
- the ACC has on'y won 6 NCs in football since 1953, of which 4 were won by non-original members (3 by FSU and 1 by GTech). The 2 NCs won by original ACC members were Maryland in 1953, now gone from the ACC, and Clemson in 1981);
- the SEC has won more NCs in football in a row at 7, than all of the NCs won by the ACC since its inception in 1953 at 6;
- no ACC team, other FSU, is ranked in the top 15 in five of the top pre-season polls this year (now there is ACC respect);
- VaTech has never ever beaten a team ranked 5 or higher when the game was played;
- last year, FSU thrashed overmatched ACC while coasting to the the national title game, only to beat Auburn by 3 to win a great game with a great comeback;
- lets not forget the West Virginia 70, Clemson 33 debacle in the Orange Bowl;
- according to Tommy Bowden: "I was in the ACC for 10 years and you hate to say it,but it [ACC] doesn't stack up [SEC]...All you can go by are statistics, and those are black and white. There's been a pattern of consistency. … In games of relevance and significance, the ACC has fallen short. … It's happened so many times that [the ACC] has lost its legitimacy."
- out of the last 43 games between Georgia and GTech, Georgia has won 33, times 33 TIMES!;
- South Carolina has beaten Clemson 5 years straight -who is Clemson's Daddy?; and
- the ACC had loss lost at least 35 straight games - that's right - 35 straight games against non-conference opponents ranked in the top 5, before last year.
I know, I know, stop with the ACC facts and history, it kills a good
ACC-agenda spin story."
fsujd
"What matters now is where the ACC is at present (2013 season) or do you want to
dwell on FSU's lost decade too?
11 bowl teams- NCAA record
2-0 BCS bowls SEC 0-2 bowls
ACC won just about every major individual player award
2nd in NFL draft picks
Has the national champions
There are 3 other P5 conferences besides the SEC yet you only compare ACC to SEC
Conference payout 20.8 million ACC; 20.9 million SEC
ND, who UGA is wetting themselves over to have a 2 game series with, is going to be an ACC regular each season
Come join the rest of us in 2014.
11 bowl teams- NCAA record
2-0 BCS bowls SEC 0-2 bowls
ACC won just about every major individual player award
2nd in NFL draft picks
Has the national champions
There are 3 other P5 conferences besides the SEC yet you only compare ACC to SEC
Conference payout 20.8 million ACC; 20.9 million SEC
ND, who UGA is wetting themselves over to have a 2 game series with, is going to be an ACC regular each season
Come join the rest of us in 2014.
The guy who claims to be opposing "ACC spin" is spinning his numbers! For example, he quotes a 5-6 bowl record, then tosses out Maryland's national championship... but Maryland was one of the 6 bowl losses! Are they IN or OUT?
ReplyDeleteIMO, you have to look at the ACC as it is configured in 2014. That means toss out the bowl losses by Maryland and Miami (beat by Louisville), giving the league a bowl record of 5-4. You also have to count national championships by Miami (5), Pitt (1) and Syracuse (1) when comparing to SEC "since 1953", thus making it ACC 12, SEC 21 - and that's counting a bunch of split N/C titles for the SEC which they don't deserve IMO, but I counted them anyway.
Finally, he accuses others of ignoring the facts, then he puts up a 2013 score of "Vanderbilt 23 - Duke 21" between two teams which DID NOT PLAY last year! The fact is that an 8-4 Vanderbilt team playing at HOME barely edged out a 4-8 Wake Forest team... but that doesn't fit his agenda, I guess?