Thursday, October 7, 2021

NSF grant funds new 40T superconducting magnet design at FSU-headquartered MagLab

 

NSF grant funds new 40T superconducting magnet design at FSU-headquartered MagLab


A new $15.8 million grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) will produce a detailed design for the world’s most powerful superconducting magnet at the Florida State University-headquartered National High Magnetic Field Laboratory.

While the National MagLab is already home to more than a dozen world-record magnets used by researchers from around the world, the future 40-tesla magnet will advance the study of quantum matter with its low-noise environment that surpasses present-day resistive and hybrid magnets.

“This project is a fantastic example of how science works on the edge of our understanding: engineers will design a new instrument that has never been built before that holds the promise to become a state-of the-art tool for physicists to answer outstanding research questions about the mysteries of quantum materials,” said MagLab Director Greg Boebinger. “Our user community is excited about the virtually limitless time at peak field and low noise environment this future magnet, once constructed, would provide to advance their research goals.”

The design for a new 40T magnet will call for the use of cutting-edge materials known as high-temperature superconductors (HTS), which allow a near perfect flow of electrons at higher temperatures than their earlier low-temperature counterparts. To put this magnet design in perspective, a typical refrigerator magnet has a field of about .01T and low-temperature superconductors have a maximum field of 25T.

Dozens of researchers within the lab’s Magnet Science and Technology department and Applied Superconductivity Center will bring their unique expertise in materials research, magnet design and technology development to this new project. The MagLab’s demonstrated successes in magnet research and development include two recent breakthroughs in HTS technology: a 32-tesla all-superconducting magnet that was designed, built and reached full field at the MagLab in December 2017 and a 14.5 tesla test coil that reached a world record 45.5-tesla field strength inside a 31-tesla resistive magnet.

“Magnets are only as good as the materials and technologies in which they are built,” said Mark Bird, director of the Magnet Science and Technology division at the National MagLab. “A magnet like this can only be achieved at the National MagLab where we are leading a revolution in understanding and leveraging high-temperature superconductors.”

For the final design, MagLab scientists and engineers are considering two different magnet technologies using the high-temperature superconductor known as “rare earth barium copper oxide” or REBCO.  The two design strategies take different approaches to address inconsistency in the performance of the REBCO tape. One design uses multiple REBCO tapes in parallel, while the other involves applying a resistive insulation to the tape. The team will develop test coils to advance our understanding of screening currents, stress, and quench protection —each one a component of the myriad technical arcana that must be mastered for the future magnet to be successful.

After additional testing and characterization work, MagLab engineers will complete a final design that will describe in complete detail how a 40T superconducting magnet should be constructed, including the cost and schedule for construction.

“The National High Magnetic Field Laboratory’s extraordinary work over the past few decades is evident from the fact that they continue to attract support from the National Science Foundation and others to take us even further in magnet development,” said Interim Vice President for Research Laurel Fulkerson. “We are proud of the work they have already done and will continue to do as they develop a design for the 40T magnet.”

The grant funds design work through 2026 and is part of the NSF’s Mid-scale Research Infrastructure 1 Program (Mid-scale RI-1), special funding that supports the design efforts for compelling projects that meet a scientific need and enable US researchers to remain competitive in a global research environment.

“U.S. researchers need cutting-edge tools to stay at the forefront of science and technology,” said NSF Director Sethuraman Panchanathan. “NSF is committed to filling this mid-scale space in the American scientific research infrastructure by investing in research facilities and instrumentation that advance next-generation discoveries.”

Success at this stage will lay the groundwork for a future proposal that, if successful, would fund the construction of the 40T magnet and is an important stepping-stone on the route to a future 60T hybrid magnet, one of the most challenging future magnets proposed in national reports on high magnetic field science.

Tuesday, September 28, 2021

FSU ranks among top colleges for free expression

 

FSU ranks among top colleges for free expression

Florida State University placed No. 5 in the 2021 College Free Speech Rankings published by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) Tuesday. FSU is the highest-rated university from the state of Florida on the list.

FIRE, a national campus free speech organization, used seven components to identify the best campuses for student free speech and open inquiry among 159 of America’s most prestigious colleges. The top-ranked colleges have the highest average score among all students surveyed and have the most open environments for free speech.

“This ranking is a testament to Florida State University’s enduring commitment to foster a respectful and civil environment where students can freely discuss and exchange different beliefs and opinions,” said Amy Hecht, vice president for Student Affairs. “We’re pleased that our efforts to protect every individual’s right to free speech and expression have been recognized by FIRE.”

FIRE surveyed 37,104 college students currently enrolled in four-year degree programs at 159 colleges and universities in the United States. Students answered a survey of 25 items about their experience and attitudes about free speech and expression on their college campuses. Students also answered an open-ended question about their experiences.

The college rankings are based on a composite score of seven sub-components: Openness, Tolerance for Conservative Speakers, Tolerance for Liberal Speakers, Administrative Support for Free Speech, Comfort Expressing Ideas, Disruptive Conduct, and FIRE’s Speech Code Rating.

Last year, FSU revised its policies on free expression to earn FIRE’s top free speech — or “green light” — rating.





Florida State University may build its own hotel in Tallahassee

 

Florida State University may build its own hotel in Tallahassee



With a hospitality college ranked seventh nationally and academic and sporting programs that bring 75,000 visitors annually to the city, Florida State University is moving forward with plans to add an “academic” hotel to its campus inventory.

The university’s Board of Trustees voted by consent last week to approve a request to include a hotel site in FSU’s master plan, which was delayed last year due to COVID planning and could take 12 months to finalize.

Approval by trustees was needed because it involves an amendment to the master plan, which serves as a blueprint for campus properties and future development.

The move also keeps alive the university’s vision to create an Arena District, expanding its footprint from downtown Tallahassee to the main campus.

“Adding an academic hotel to FSU’s operational program will allow Dedman to expand its academic offerings around hotel operations and continue to aspire higher in hospitality education,” Clark said. He noted FSU, in a typical year, “generates well over 75,000 room nights.”

FSU has been aiming to build arena district

For the past few years, FSU has been in discussions with city and county commissioners sitting as the Blueprint Intergovernmental Agency about its vision to create an arena district connecting FSU's campus to the Tucker Civic Center, of which it took ownership in 2012.

The district would consist of a convention center, a hotel, and the new location for the FSU College of Business. The university and Blueprint are still in discussions on the convention center and a formal memorandum of understanding has not been approved.

Despite that, the Blueprint agency last March committed $40 million to build the convention center, upping its original proposal by $20 million.

The plan involved Blueprint funding the design and construction of the convention center with FSU maintaining it moving forward.

But in September the Blueprint panel tapped into that bank and recommitted $10 million of that money to Florida A&M University to pay the majority costs for renovations at Bragg Memorial Stadium.

The hotel will be a public-private partnership between FSU and Development Ventures Group, Inc, (DEVEN). That partnership scenario calls for the developer partner to provide the financing and assume the risks of the project, Graham said.

DEVEN developed the $260 million Knight’s Plaza project in a public-private partnership with the University of Central Florida, according to its website. It also developed The Celeste Hotel at the entrance to UCF in partnership with Demetree Global and Pinnacle Hotel Management.

The hotel will be located on the northern side of the surface parking directly between the Turnbull Conference Center and the Tucker Civic Center.

“The hotel plan wasn’t approved (by trustees). What was approved was allowing a hotel to be constructed on university property,” Graham said. “This is the first step.”

Monday, September 6, 2021

FSU/ND TV Ratings are massive

 








Monday, August 23, 2021

Record-breaking freshman class set to start fall semester

 

Record-breaking freshman class to attend FSU this fall

On Aug. 23, 7,200 first-year students walked to classes for the first time — a record-breaking number for a record-breaking year.

Following a slightly smaller number of first-year students in fall of 2020, the jump to 7,200 was surprising, considering the consistency of the previous years, according to the Office of Institutional Research at Florida State University. 

With a 4.3 GPA, 1310 SAT and 29 ACT, the average statistics for 2021 were at the higher end of the spectrum compared to every other years’ statistics on incoming freshman. Based on these numbers, it was seemingly more difficult to get in for the Fall 2021 school year, and yet FSU received about 10,000 more applications than in 2020. 

With 66,000 applications to review, Hege Ferguson, the director of Admissions, released a statement ensuring it wasn’t an accident that an additional 3,000 to 4,000 students were accepted into FSU this year.

“We have spent months reviewing academic records, reading essays and learning about the interests of our applicants," Ferguson said. "We had to make some very difficult choices, but in the end, we feel confident in our decisions.”


Record-breaking freshman class set to start fall semester

About 7,200 first-year students and a new president will be among the fresh faces on Florida State University’s campus as fall classes begin Monday, Aug. 23.

President Richard McCullough, who starts his second week as FSU’s 16th president Monday, is excited to join the largest freshman class in the university’s history and a record number of graduate students in becoming a part of the Florida State family.

“I’m thrilled to start my tenure at the beginning of a new academic year and to welcome a very impressive freshman class,” McCullough said. “This is not only the biggest freshman class but one of the brightest, and I can’t wait to see the contributions these students will make to our university community.”

More than 66,000 first-year students applied for admission to FSU for the summer and fall 2021 semesters. Of those first-year students who were accepted into the university for the summer and fall semesters:

  • The average high school grade point average was 4.3 with an average 1310 total SAT score and ACT composite score of 29.
  • The cohort includes students from 66 Florida counties and, all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and 49 countries. After Florida, the states with the most accepted freshmen are Georgia, New York, New Jersey, Illinois and Texas.
  • Women make up 60 percent of the new freshman class, while 40 percent of the students are male.
  • The top five majors selected are biological science, business, engineering, psychology and exploratory/undecided.

For the second consecutive year, FSU received more than 14,000 graduate school applications for the fall term — an 83 percent increase in applications since Fall 2017. This year’s graduate student cohort is expected to be FSU’s largest, exceeding last year’s record enrollment of nearly 9,700 graduate students.

ACC Member Statistics

Expenses by school​

https://richmond.com/sports/college...cle_9aa34890-0a03-5e7c-ab4b-7331572be3e2.html

Expenses by school​

SchoolRevenueDonations*TicketsExpensesSportsFB Asst.**FB support***
Clemson$129.9M$43.4M$29.9M$131.8M19$8.7M$7.2M
Florida State$129.5M$36.8M$17.3M$155.7M20$7.0M$3.6M
Ga. Tech$86.4M$11.M$10.4M$96.1M17$4.5M$1.7M
Louisville$140.9M$30.4M$27.5M$138.8M23$4.6M$2.4M
UNC$110.4M$21.6M$24.8M$113.0M28$5.8M$2.7M
N.C. State$86.6M$15.1M$23.5M$88.7M23$4.9M$3.0M
Virginia$110.3M$27.7M$15.5M$111.8M27$4.6M$2.8M
Virginia Tech$99.2M$21.8M$19.2M$97.5M22$4.3M$2.3M

ACC rivals' financial documents for 2019-20 - Public Schools Only

Each January, Division I athletic departments file a financial report of about 80 pages to the NCAA for the previous academic year. Below is Detailed annual financial reports filed by the ACC’s eight public institutions to the NCAA.

* Contributions collected and used in 2019-20.

** Total salaries, benefits and bonuses for the 10 assistant coaches permitted by the NCAA.

*** Total salaries, benefits for football support staff such as quality control coaches and recruiting assistants.

Expenses by school
Revenue
Louisville - $140.9M
Clemson - $129.9M
FSU - $129.5M
UNC - $110.4M
UVA- $110.3M
VT - $99.2M
NC ST - $86.6M
GT - $86.4M

Donations*
Clemson - $43.4M
FSU - $36.8M
Louisville - $30.4M
UVA- $27.7M
VT - $21.8M
UNC - $21.6M
NC ST - $15.1M
GT - $11M

Ticket Sales
Clemson - $29.9M
Louisville - $27.5M
UNC - $24.8M
NC ST - $23.5M
VT - $19.2M
FSU - $17.3M
UVA - $15.5M
GT - $10.4M

Expenses
FSU - $155.7M
Louisville - $138.8M
Clemson - $131.8M
UNC - $113.0M
UVA - $111.8M
VT - $97.5M
GT - $96.1M
NC ST - $88.7M

Total Sports Programs
UNC - 28
UVA - 27
NC ST - 23
Louisville - 23
VT - 22
FSU - 20
Clemson - 19
GT - 17

FB Asst. Total salaries**
Clemson - $8.7M
FSU -$7.0M
UNC - $5.8M
NC ST - $4.9M
Louisville - $4.6M
UVA - $4.6M
GT - $4.5M
VT - $4.3M

FB support staff Total salaries***
Clemson - $7.2M
FSU - $3.6M
NC ST - $3.0M
UVA - $2.8M
UNC - $2.7M
Louisville - $2.4M
VT - $2.3M
GT - $1.7M


Link
https://richmond.com/sports/college/teel...be3e2.html

Monday, August 16, 2021

TV Viewership #s

 Which college football programs bring in the most TV viewers?

Average TV Viewership, by school


Finally, his numbers - but I added the bar graphs and highlighted ACC schools in light blue, plausible expansion teams in pink:

SchoolVwrsgraphically
Ohio State5.19M===================================================
Alabama5.09M==================================================
Michigan4.18M=========================================
Notre Dame3.61M====================================
LSU3.22M================================
Auburn3.12M===============================
Georgia2.91M=============================
Oklahoma2.90M=============================
Clemson2.67M==========================
Penn State2.55M=========================
Florida2.46M========================
Wisconsin2.27M======================
Texas2.269M======================
Florida State2.23M======================
Michigan State2.20M======================
Southern Cal1.98M===================
Tennessee1.85M==================
Texas A&M1.75M=================
Oklahoma State1.64M================
Mississippi1.61M================
Iowa1.57M===============
Nebraska1.51M===============
Miami1.503M===============
TCU1.495M==============
Stanford1.43M==============
Oregon1.34M=============
Arkansas1.33M=============
Washington1.32M=============
Mississippi State1.31M=============
West Virginia1.27M============
Virginia Tech1.26M============
UCLA1.25M============
Louisville1.22M============
Indiana1.17M===========
Baylor1.12M===========
South Carolina1.07M==========
Texas Tech921K=========
Washington State909K=========
Northwestern867K========
Utah856K========
Minnesota803K========
Pittsburgh781K=======
North Carolina749K=======
Iowa State747K=======
California730K=======
BYU714K=======
NC State703K=======
Arizona State695K======
Syracuse694K======
Houston689K======
Kansas State682K======
Maryland681K======
Purdue620K======
Georgia Tech615K======
Missouri611K======
Colorado610K======
Virginia592K=====
UCF566K=====
Memphis564K=====
Arizona561K=====
Kentucky484K====
Boise State476K====
Vanderbilt438K====
Cincinnati430K====
Duke410K====
USF407K====
Boston College403K====
Illinois401K====
Wake Forest398K===
Kansas346K===
Oregon State295K==
Rutgers266K==
SMU232K==


https://csnbbs.com/thread-920637-page-5.html


Zach Miller has posted an article "Which college football programs bring in the most TV viewers?

He logged 1,516 regular-season games with available viewership data from the five-year span of 2015-19 (left out 2020 for obvious reasons). That includes every televised game involving Notre Dame, BYU, Army or a team from the Big Ten, SEC, ACC, Big 12, Pac-12, AAC or Mountain West. He ranked every Power 5 team, plus Notre Dame and the eight schools most popularly mentioned as Big 12 expansion candidates. The numbers next to each school indicate the average number of viewers per week from 2015–19. Streaming numbers are included when available.

Here is his ACC Viewership (Your first column)

Clemson #9 (2.67M avg weekly viewers)
FSU #14 (2.23M avg weekly viewers)
Miami #23 (1.503M avg weekly viewers)
VT #31 (1.26M avg weekly viewers)
Louisville #31 (1.22M avg weekly viewers)
Pitt #42 (781K avg weekly viewers)
UNC #43 (749K avg weekly viewers)
NC State #47 (703K avg weekly viewers)
Syracuse #49 (694K avg weekly viewers)
GT #54 (615K avg weekly viewers)
UVA #57 (592K avg weekly viewers)
DUKE #65 (410K avg weekly viewers)
BC #67 (403K avg weekly viewers)
Wake #69 (398K avg weekly viewers)

ACC Partial mbr
Notre Dame #4 (3.61M avg weekly viewers)


So my question is where do you get your rankings for your first column? I would love to look at them.


Link
https://medium.com/run-it-back-with-zach...c03c689e50



Sports Media Watch (SMW) is the source for both analysis. SMW reports viewership on all rated games.

Some of the major differences in the methodologies used:
1) Zach Miller looked at 5 years of viewership…2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019; I looked at 4 years of viewership…2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.
2) In stack ranking programs Zach Miller only considered regular season games, only ranked “avg viewers” data, reported the top 73 FBS programs and assumed zero viewers for non-rated games; I looked at “avg viewers” and “total viewers”, stack ranked only P5 teams, incorporated both regular & post-season and excluded non-rated games from the analysis.


Why does the SEC get more for TV rights?

Logically, TV money should be about delivering TV audience, right? I mean, isn't that why a first tier game (T1) is worth more than a second tier (T2) one? In "What is a Tier 1 CFB Game Worth?", we tried to estimate the average values of these games and came up with

T1: $13M each

T2: $4M each

T3: $1M each

What we didn't do, however, is tell you the TV ratings associated with each tier. So I looked at the games actually selected as tier one by the networks (for the SEC, the CBS games; for the ACC, the ABC games) to get a feel for the expected TV ratings of a T1 game.

T1: 3.8 million viewers or more

T2: 0.25 to 3.8 million viewers

T3: less than 250,000 viewers

That's a pretty high bar for the first tier, but you'd think second tier should be easy to achieve, right? You might be surprised as we continue...

Here are the T1 (greater than or equal to 3.80 million viewers) conference games from 2016 through 2019 for both SEC and ACC (I removed non-conference games to avoid confusing the issue, nor did I include the pandemic season of 2020):

SECT1ACCT1
20162016
ALA-LSU10.39LOU-CLM9.29
TAM-ALA8.46FSU-LOU6.22
AUB-ALA8.24FSU-MIA5.54
ALA-MS8.17CLM-FSU5.38
ALA-TEN6.58PIT-CLM4.93
TEN-TAM6.55NCS-CLM4.51
FL-TEN5.54
AUB-UGA4.99
FL-UGA4.45
ALA-ARK4.44
FL-ARK4.26
UGA-TEN4.22
LSU-AUB4.1
ARK-TAM3.87
20172017
ALA-AUG13.66CLM-LOU5.06
UGA-AUB7.41CLM-VT4.61
ALA-MSU7.03MIA-PIT4.56
LSU-ALA6.73
TEN-FL5.13
ALA-TAM4.77
TEN-ALA4.45
LSU-FL4.13
UGA-TEN3.95
ARK-ALA3.87
20182018
ALA-LSU11.54VT-FSU5.58
AUB-ALA9.13SYR-CLM4.62
UGA-FL6.35CLM-BC3.93
LSU-AUB5.94
TAM-ALA5.65
UGA-LSU5.54
MSU-ALA5.42
LSU-FL4.7
UGA-UK4.39
ALA-TEN4.31
ALA-MS4.11
AUG-UGA3.99
2019Vwr(M)2019Vwr(M)
LSU-ALA16.64CLM-UNC4.4
ALA-AUB11.43
AUB-LSU7.18
UGA-UF6.98
UGA-AUB6.77
UF-LSU6.45
AUB-UF6.43
ALA-TAM6.11
ALA-SC4.95
TAM-UGA4.89
AUB-TAM4.66
TEN-ALA4.25
UGA-TEN3.9
LSU-MSU3.86