Thursday, October 29, 2015

ACC channel launch facing delay

ACC will break apart and Power 4 is going to happen.  Sad the ACC refused to change....now they will go to worse situations where the change will happen for them anyway.

This is on Tobacco Road.


Dan Wolken @DanWolken 25 minutes ago
Again, it’s not the football product. The SEC $$ is getting bigger every year. The Big Ten is about to get paid. The ACC is falling behind.

Dan Wolken @DanWolken 30 minutes ago
It’s not about the playoff. It’s about revenue. The ACC is No. 5

Dan Wolken @DanWolken 31 minutes ago
And that is not me interpreting. The term “Power 4” has been uttered to me by high ranking officials at multiple ACC schools.

Dan Wolken @DanWolken 33 minutes ago
I’ll say this. Several admins at ACC schools are worried that the Power 5 is really a Power 4 and they’re on the outside. This is a big deal


ACC channel launch facing delay


"The launch of an ACC network run in partnership with ESPN, which has been expected for 2017, will likely take longer than expected.
The cable giant has asked for the delay, according to Georgia Tech president G.P. “Bud” Peterson, who made the statement at last week’s Georgia Tech Athletic Association quarterly board meeting. Conversations between the league and network are ongoing. The conference and network have discussed partnering on a dedicated ACC channel at least five years
“(ESPN) had come back and said that in some of the other instances where (conference) networks have started, they lost considerable amounts of money in the first couple of years,” Peterson said. “What they’d like to do is delay the start for a couple years and do the necessary preparation.”
In exchange for a later start date, ESPN could make additional payments on top of the rights fees already paid to the conference, Peterson said. The conference signed an extension with ESPN in 2012 to continue their partnership through the 2026-27 academic year, a deal that was renegotiated with the addition of Notre Dame later that year and a grant of rights agreement in 2013. The league reportedly received $197.2 million in TV revenues in 2013-14. While the average distribution to full league members of $19.3 million distribution was considerable, it lagged behind the Big Ten ($26.4 million), Pac-12 ($21 million), SEC ($20.9 million) and Big 12 ($19.8 million).
It is a significant reason why the ACC and member schools are interested in their own network, similar to cable channels for the Big Ten and SEC. Both conferences have seen television revenues increase dramatically after the start of their networks. This past May, for instance, the SEC projected revenues of $31.2 million per school for the 2014-15 fiscal year, a 49 percent jump from the previous year due in no small part to the launch of the SEC Network in 2014.
Evidently, the request to delay from 2017 is a result of ESPN’s desire to properly time the launch of an ACC channel, wanting to ensure broad distribution with cable operators.
The Big Ten Network faced distribution challenges early on, as it was carried by a limited number of cable providers for the first year of its existence. Likewise, the Pac-12 Networks have had distribution issues of their own.
The SEC Network, with its conference’s rabid following, didn’t have the same troubles, as demands by fans to cable and satellite companies to add the network led to broad distribution from the network’s inception.
Perhaps the league’s strongest selling point to ESPN is its footprint, which extends almost the entire length of the Eastern seaboard and into the Midwest with Notre Dame. Two years ago, the league claimed the highest population (107 million) and most television households (38 million) within its footprint of any conference in the country, an area that includes major markets such as New York, Washington, Boston, Miami and Atlanta.
It probably helps, too, that Florida State and Clemson’s football teams have grown stronger in recent seasons and that the league’s basketball teams remain as powerful as ever.
Regardless, a channel dedicated to the ACC will have to wait a few more years."

Saturday, October 24, 2015

College Town Phase 2





ACC football: Don’t believe the hype

The ACC wont react, they never do.   The ACC solution is change nothing and hope for different results



ACC football: Don’t believe the hype

Columnist
Welcome to another fabulous season of ACC football — the league that always delivers . . . once basketball season starts.
Those who are paid to promote the ACC, and there are plenty of them, will point out that the ACC has four ranked teams (!!!) led by Clemson at No. 6 and Florida State at No. 9.
John Feinstein is a sports columnist for The Washington Post and also provides commentary for the Golf Channel and National Public Radio. View Archive
Duke and Pittsburgh also are in the top 25 this week.
Wow.
Now, let’s look a little closer at all the numbers. Clemson and Florida State have one combined victory over a top 25 team — Clemson’s win at home against Notre Dame in the midst of a monsoon. The Irish, who are a pseudo-ACC football team, also have built their record on the strength of wins against less-than-stellar teams. They haven’t beaten any team that is currently ranked and have played two road games: an escape against Virginia (2-4) and their sloppy loss at Clemson.
Florida State opened its season with wins over two powerhouses: Texas State and South Florida. Clemson played an equally tough early schedule, hosting Wofford and Appalachian State.
Regardless, they are the only two ACC teams that matter. Duke, Pittsburgh and North Carolina, all 5-1, have beaten exactly nobody. Duke has the ACC’s other win over a top 25 team at the time — a victory over Georgia Tech when the Yellow Jackets were still ranked on the basis of crushing Alcorn State and Tulane by a combined 134-16. Since then, playing real football teams, Georgia Tech is 0-5.
So if you are scoring at home, the ACC has faced top 25 teams from outside the conference eight times — counting Notre Dame as outside the conference. Its record in those games is a sterling 1-7.
And yet the winner of the Florida State-Clemson game on Nov. 7 undoubtedly will make it to the College Football Playoff unless it stumbles. Both schools do have to play teams from a real football conference, the Southeastern Conference, later in November. Clemson goes to South Carolina (3-4), which lost its coach this season; FSU travels to much-improved Florida. It might behoove ACC Commissioner John Swofford to show up in Death Valley Nov. 7 dressed in orange because the Tigers’ chances of going undefeated might be a good deal better than the Seminoles’.
Swofford has spent most of his tenure raiding the old Big East to try to make the ACC a real football conference. First he went after Miami, Virginia Tech and Boston College. Back then, Miami and Virginia Tech were still important football teams. In fact, Virginia Tech won at least 10 games in its first eight ACC seasons, helped a good deal by playing against the bottom of the ACC every year.
But the Hokies have slid into mediocrity the last four falls. Their record since the start of 2011 is 25-21, including 3-4 this season, as they get ready to play Duke on Saturday. There’s no doubt that David Cutcliffe has done amazing work at Duke, but his team’s four wins this season against top-tier opponents (the fifth win was over North Carolina Central of the lower Football Championship Subdivision) have come against teams with a combined record of 9-18.
Miami had been one of the powers in college football, and Swofford undoubtedly thought Florida State-Miami would bring the ACC a rivalry worthy of national attention year in and year out. Not so much. The infamous “U” hasn’t won 10 games in a season since it joined the ACC, and it is possible Al Golden will become the third coach shown the door since 2006 when this season ends.
When Miami and Virginia Tech couldn’t deliver any big-game traction, Swofford went back to the Big East well, luring Syracuse, Pittsburgh and later Louisville to join the league. Those moves strengthened basketball, though not so much the league’s image: Syracuse is on NCAA probation, and Louisville is in the midst of a scandal involving strippers and basketball players and recruits.
All three fit in perfectly to the ACC as football teams, though: They’re all consistently mediocre.
Finally, Swofford made the ridiculous deal in which Notre Dame was allowed to join as a full ACC member in all sports — except the one that people care about. As one Notre Dame coach put it back then: “If I’m the ACC, my opening line in negotiations would be, ‘If you aren’t bringing the gold helmets, there’s no point in talking any further.’ ”
Notre Dame is occasionally bringing the gold helmets — playing five ACC teams a year, up from the past when it usually played three — while getting full status in the other sports and not having to face the dangers of a conference championship game in years when it’s good. The ACC also gave Notre Dame an excuse to drop Michigan and Michigan State. Instead, this year, the Irish will play Virginia and Wake Forest.
The bottom line: Through all the expansion and all the hype, the ACC is, at best, a two-team league. Florida State has returned to prominence the last four seasons and won a national championship two years ago, even though its best player was tainted by a series of off-field embarrassments. Clemson has won a lot of games under Dabo Swinney but is still waiting for the breakthrough win that will make it truly matter again. The Notre Dame win was nice, but the Irish aren’t great, and the game was at home.
A win, even at home, over Florida State would help. At least then the Tigers almost certainly would get a chance to see how they do against the big boys in the playoff.
Regardless of the outcome of that game, the ACC is a two-team, one-game-that-matters-each-year conference. Does it matter who wins the Coastal Division? Only to the team that does and gets to go to Charlotte and get hammered by Clemson or Florida State.
And yet the ACC will loudly trumpet that it has 10 bowl teams. It will tell us about its great nonconference record. It won’t mention the dearth of top 25 wins and the remarkably weak schedules played by most of its teams, Virginia being the notable exception.
The ACC desperately wants to believe that all is well. It desperately wants the emperor’s new clothes to be spectacular. The truth is, there’s very little to see.

Friday, October 23, 2015

Seminole Boosters 2015 Annual Fund Update



Seminole Boosters 2015 Annual Fund Update


Aug 11, 11:05 AM Premium Post
 
Fund dollars
Goal - $17,643,000
Raised - $15,777,140
Fund members
Goal - 18.760
Current - 12,963
"Following an impressive 2014 Annual Fund year that saw membership and dollars grow to a level not seen in years, Seminole Boosters, Inc. has set aggressive goals for the 2015 Annual Fund performance to continue the upward trend. With 5 months remaining in the 2015 campaign and the new athletic and academic year about to get started, we are pleased with our current results but need your help to reach our goals in support of Florida State Athletics as one of the premier programs in the nation.
If you were a 2014 member and have already renewed we thank you for your support and ask that you refer a friend, neighbor, family member or any Nole you can find that wants to support the success of our Seminoles.
If you were a 2014 member that has not yet renewed, please do so now and help us reach and exceed our 2015 goals."

Leonard Fournette and the Force-Fed Heisman Narrative

and the ACCs network is?.....


Leonard Fournette and the Force-Fed Heisman Narrative

Stat of the day



The Spear @FSUeyedoc 21 hours ago
List of FBS football programs with only 2 head coaches over the last 40 seasons:
 
1. FSU