Wednesday, July 16, 2014

ACC football debate among FSU fans

Interesting debate.  Very strong opinions on both sides with the FSU fan base when it comes to the ACC. 
 
I think the ACC has improved, but unless 2-3 other teams make a PROGRAM jump (not a season, but a PROGRAM jump), the conference is still not deep enough.
 
I don't think there is a program in the ACC ready to make this jump.  Not yet.  I will be thrilled to be proven wrong.




Re: SEC network scores big - ACC?


moz9


"For a conference that has won 3 BCS games, a national title, and has had numerous award winners, NFL draftees all in the last two years, I'll stand by my statement.  You're so obssessed with the SEC that you can't even see the facts straight. "
 
Nole4757


"You are a one hit (year) wonder, thanks to FSU.

You do realize that the ACC:

  • was an abysmal 5-13 in BCS play with a winning percentage of .278;
  • the ACC went 5-6 in Bowl play last season where four of the six losses were by double digits. Of the three wins, only one came against a power 5 conference team;
  • the ACC has on'y won 6 NCs in football since 1953, of which 4 were won by non-original members (3 by FSU and 1 by GTech). The 2 NCs won by original ACC members were Maryland in 1953, now gone from the ACC, and Clemson in 1981);
  • the SEC has won more NCs in football in a row at 7, than all of the NCs won by the ACC since its inception in 1953 at 6;
  • no ACC team, other FSU, is ranked in the top 15 in five of the top pre-season polls this year (now there is ACC respect);
  • VaTech has never ever beaten a team ranked 5 or higher when the game was played;
  • last year, FSU thrashed overmatched ACC while coasting to the the national title game, only to beat Auburn by 3 to win a great game with a great comeback;
  • lets not forget the West Virginia 70, Clemson 33 debacle in the Orange Bowl;
  • according to Tommy Bowden: "I was in the ACC for 10 years and you hate to say it,but it [ACC] doesn't stack up [SEC]...All you can go by are statistics, and those are black and white. There's been a pattern of consistency. … In games of relevance and significance, the ACC has fallen short. … It's happened so many times that [the ACC] has lost its legitimacy."
  • out of the last 43 games between Georgia and GTech, Georgia has won 33, times 33 TIMES!;
  • South Carolina has beaten Clemson 5 years straight -who is Clemson's Daddy?; and
  • the ACC had loss lost at least 35 straight games - that's right - 35 straight games against non-conference opponents ranked in the top 5, before last year.


I know, I know, stop with the ACC facts and history, it kills a good ACC-agenda spin story."


fsujd

"What matters now is where the ACC is at present (2013 season) or do you want to dwell on FSU's lost decade too?

11 bowl teams- NCAA record
2-0 BCS bowls  SEC 0-2 bowls
ACC won just about every major individual player award
2nd in NFL draft picks
Has the national champions
There are 3 other P5 conferences besides the SEC yet you only compare ACC to SEC
Conference payout 20.8 million ACC; 20.9 million SEC
ND, who UGA is wetting themselves over to have a 2 game series with, is going to be an ACC regular each season
Come join the rest of us in 2014.
2013 National Football Champions"


 
Nole4757

"fsujd:

Ahhh, the glass is 1/1000th full.

The ACC lost 6 of 11 bowl games, one to Marshall.  Of the 11 bowl games, 8 were in the toilet bowl or less, but heck, the ACC had 11 bowl teams where winning is irrelevant.

But, here is a snap shot of the ACC's body of work in 2013:

USC 35 - BC 7
USCe 37 - Clemson 17
FSU 51 - Clemson 14
FSU 45 - Duke 7
Texas A&M 52 - Duke 48
Georgia 45 - GTech 34
Miss 25 - GTech 17
BYU 38 - GTech 20
FSU 63 - Maryland 0
Marshall 31 - Maryland 20
FSU 41 - Miami 14
Louisville 36 - Miami 9 (Didn't Louisville like lose to UCF?)
East Carolina 55 - UNC 31
USCe 27 - UNC 10
East Carolina 42 - NCState 28
WFU 28 - NCState 13
FSU 49 - NCState 17
Navy 24 - Pitt 21
FSU 41 - Pitt 13
PSU 23 - Syracuse 17
Northwestern 48 - Syracuse 27
FSU 59 - Syracuse 3
Oregon 59 - Virginia 10
Ball State 48 - Virginia 27
Alabama 35 - VTech 10
UCLA 42 - VaTech 12
ULM 21 - WFU 19
Vanderbilt 23 - Duke 21

An impressive body of work by the ACC members in 2013, wouldn't you agree?

I can see why you and Moz9 are raving over just how good the ACC is in football.

My personal favorite are the ACC losses to football powers ULM, Ball State, Marshall and twice, not once, to East Carolina.
Notwithstanding the above, I must admit, I did get a big laugh watching GTech try to play offense against Ole Miss in its Bowl game.  It was like watching comedy hour.
 
Given the ACC's past football performances in 2013 and ever since 1953, the year in which the ACC was still born in football, I can see now why you will feel that the ACC has been "snub" by the sports pundits by not naming one ACC team, not one, other than FSU, in their top 15 for the upcoming 2014 season.
 
The ACC - what a football conference."

1 comment:

  1. The guy who claims to be opposing "ACC spin" is spinning his numbers! For example, he quotes a 5-6 bowl record, then tosses out Maryland's national championship... but Maryland was one of the 6 bowl losses! Are they IN or OUT?

    IMO, you have to look at the ACC as it is configured in 2014. That means toss out the bowl losses by Maryland and Miami (beat by Louisville), giving the league a bowl record of 5-4. You also have to count national championships by Miami (5), Pitt (1) and Syracuse (1) when comparing to SEC "since 1953", thus making it ACC 12, SEC 21 - and that's counting a bunch of split N/C titles for the SEC which they don't deserve IMO, but I counted them anyway.

    Finally, he accuses others of ignoring the facts, then he puts up a 2013 score of "Vanderbilt 23 - Duke 21" between two teams which DID NOT PLAY last year! The fact is that an 8-4 Vanderbilt team playing at HOME barely edged out a 4-8 Wake Forest team... but that doesn't fit his agenda, I guess?

    ReplyDelete