Friday, June 30, 2023

FSU Top 10 NIL Collectives

 

FSU collective The Battle's End singled out as one of 'most ambitious' in NIL space


According to analysis from On3, The Battle’s End checks in at No. 6 on its list of the 20 “most ambitious” collectives in college sports entering Year 3 of the NIL era.


ngram Smith, CEO of The Battle’s End, told On3 earlier this year that the organization has full funding for this year and next and that it has more than 60 FSU athletes under contract. The collective also is now accepting donations and selling merchandise through its official website.


“Florida State has been aggressive, they’ve come on really strong,” a source in the industry told On3.

Florida State has two other collectives working to service student-athletes as well. Rising Spear, which was the first FSU-focused NIL collective, works with more than 200 athletes in a wide spectrum of sports. Micconope 1851 also provides NIL opportunities and is launching a career resource center for FSU athletes and alumni.

Here’s the full report on the 20 most ambitious collectives in college sports, including more information about The Battle’s End. 


On3's top 20 most ambitious NIL collectives

1. Spyre Sports Group (Tennessee)

Last spring, Spyre Sports Group caught the nation’s attention when word leaked of a five-star quarterback signing a contract that would pay up to $8 million deal by their junior year. Turns out it was Nico Iamaleava signing with Spyre, as The Athletic has since reported. That was college football’s introduction to the sports marketing agency. Since then, however, Tennessee‘s NIL operation has become the leading collective in the country. 

This fall, Tennessee football finished 11-2. The Vols knocked off Alabama for the first time since 2007. Led by co-founders Hunter Baddour and James Clawson, former sports marketing professionals, Spyre was ready to pounce. 

The for-profit arm, The Volunteer Club, has grown to 2,769 members with an expansive e-commerce business. According to Baddour, Spyre has executed 1,400 deals since July 2021. They currently have 90 athletes on active contracts. Spyre told On3 in February the Volunteer Club had procured $13.5 million in NIL deals. 

2. 12th Man+ Fund (Texas A&M)

Texas A&M has not been able to stay outside of the NIL spotlight since July 2021. The Aggies pieced together the best-ever recruiting class in 2022, with many pointing to NIL being the driving force. Then Alabama head coach Nick Saban called out Texas A&M and Jimbo Fisher for buying every player in that class. 

The Aggies’ collective – “The Fund” – was thought by many to have some of the deepest pockets. Investors in The Fund told The Athletic last April they didn’t understand why boosters in other collectives feel the need to advertise their groups.

That narrative has been put on its head in the last few months. The 12th Man+ Fund was launched publicly in February as an extension of the 12th Man Foundation, a 501(c)(3) that has been around since the 1980s and led funding initiatives for scholarships, programs and facilities in College Station. The IRS’ recent memo on nonprofit collectives does target this structure, yet it does not set a precedent. The expectation is the collective will begin announcing deals July 1.

“Everyone is watching and taking notes,” an SEC leader said. 

The new collective model has grabbed the attention of college athletics. Despite the NCAA releasing guidance this week, a new state law goes into effect Saturday. The quasi-collective will be able to work with the athletic department to hand out priority points, while having a safe harbor from the NCAA due to protections in the law. Many have dubbed The 12th Man+ Fund as the future. Others have called it illegal. Either way, Texas A&M won’t be scraping by for dollars anytime soon. And that makes whatever collective run out of College Station a threat. 

“A&M has to be one of the top collectives because of their sheer buying power,” another collective operator said. “Not a lot of creativity. But they have unlimited cash. If it comes down to who has the deepest pockets, they’re winning.”

3. Division St. (Oregon)

Division Street was one of the first NIL collectives to launch in September 2021. Since then, it has become one of the most highly-regarded organizations in the space. Some of the brightest sports marketing minds have played an integral role in the day-to-day operations of the Oregon-driven collective. 

The role of Nike and Phil Knight cannot be understated, though. The swoosh has always driven athletes to Eugene. But the NIL era has been able to marry the two brands – Nike and Oregon – together like never before. Division Street is littered with former Nike leaders, including former VP of Nike Women Rosemary St. Clair, who is the collective’s CEO. 

Division Street has not been forced to plead with donors to subscribe to a monthly program. Instead, it has its own apparel line, Ducks of a Feather. All merchandise is created by Nike, with profits going back to Oregon athletes.

“They do what they need to do,” a collective leader in the Pac-12 said. “They don’t need to build a social media brand around it. They don’t need to be as public facing as a lot of us feel like we need to. They just don’t have any of those needs. They just get to operate in the shadows and take their kids to Nike. It’s almost like they’re in a different category.”

Oregon has figured out how to best use Division Street, too. Knight’s name was trending on Twitter by noon ET of December’s National Signing Day. And as one agent pointed out, “No head coach in the country is more aggressive about NIL than Dan Lanning.

4. Texas One Fund (Texas)

Roughly six months ago, five separate NIL entities focused on Longhorn athletics came together to form the Texas One Fund. After jousting for funding, all efforts were consolidated under one umbrella.

In an NIL space where it’s common for collectives to contend with one another for control of a college market, Texas got its act together. It’s paid off. The Longhorn-driven collective has Patrick “Wheels” Smith running day-to-day operations. Football coach Steve Sarkisian and men’s basketball coach Rodney Terry recently held a meet-and-greet with fans, with a $1,000 entry fee for a couple. 

Similar to Texas A&M, they have embraced the new state law. The Texas athletic department announced earlier this month that current members of the Longhorn Foundation will earn loyalty points for any donations to the NIL collective starting July 1. With donor fatigue remaining an ever-present issue for collectives, this will give boosters a tangible return on investment. 

If there’s any questions remaining about viability, look at the collectives that came together to form the Texas One Fund. Clark Field Collective announced an initial commitment of $10 million at its launch. Horns with Heart generated headlines with its plan to pay each offensive lineman $50,000 a year. Everyone is in unison in Austin, including the donors. 

“It goes without saying, Texas has made some really strategic moves recently that have put them in a really good spot,” an SEC operator said.

5. John Ruiz/Canes Connection (Miami)

John Ruiz has now made appearances on three sets of collective rankings released by On3. But the Miami businessman has seen his role in the world of NIL shift dramatically change in recent months.

The CEO of LifeWallet and Cigarette Racing made a name for himself as one of the biggest spenders in the space. He distributed more than $10 million in NIL deals in the first year of college athletics’ new era. While the brunt of those partnerships have come with athletes who attend Miami, not all of the athletes are Hurricanes.

He grabbed headlines shortly after former Kansas State guard Nijel Pack committed to Miami in April 2022, announcing that LifeWallet had signed the guard to a two-year deal worth $800,000 along with a car. He signed three other basketball players: Isaiah WongJordan Miller and Norchad Omier. The Hurricanes made the Final Four back in March, delivering a return on investment for Ruiz. He has been adamant, however, that LifeWallet’s return on investment in NIL is not tied to the University of Miami’s success.

He also signed endorsement deals with the Cavinder Twins, the NIL stars who transferred to Miami last offseason. The NCAA placed Miami on probation this spring regarding an impermissible benefit during their recruitment. The NCAA said the Cavinders had an impermissible meal with Ruiz, who it classified as a Miami booster. The governing body did not disassociate him from the institution, which would prevent him from receiving special in-venue seating, booster memberships and interactions with coaches.

Ruiz told On3 he planned to sue the NCAA this spring. He has yet to file the paperwork. All of this comes as his healthcare company missed its 2022 fourth quarte and fiscal year earnings, according to the Action Network’s Darren Rovell.

Canes Connection has become a prominent collective in the space in the past few months, taking care of many NIL deals with the football team. When rumors circulated Tyler Van Dyke might transfer to Alabama, it was Canes Connection who signed an NIL deal with the star quarterback

“Nobody really knows what’s going on in Miami,” a source in the space told On3. “You don’t know what to expect there. You obviously know John’s body of work.”

6. The Battle’s End (Florida State)

When Ingram Smith launched The Battle’s End in December, he made one promise to Florida State fans. And a warning to the rest of the country. “I’m not going to tell you that I’m John Ruiz and I have unlimited money,” he said. “But I will tell you that we can be as competitive as we want to be in this space.”

The Seminoles-driven collective has not disappointed, especially after Florida and Miami dominated headlines in the first 18 months of NIL. A day after its launch, Jordan Travis was under contract. Making sure the quarterback is back for another season has the Seminoles in the mix for a College Football Playoff berth this fall. 

Florida State was active in the transfer portal this offseason, too, landing major names like wide receiver Keon Coleman and cornerback Fentrell Cypress. The Battle’s End has been innovative in motivating boosters. The collective sent Travis and Trey Benson to the Super Bowl, flying on a donor’s private plane to Arizona for the game. And in March, a trio of linemen attended the John R. Lewis Legacy Gala in Atlanta.

Smith told On3 in March the collective is fully financed for this year and next. As of June 22, The Battle’s End has more than 60 football players and golfers under contract.

“Florida State has been aggressive, they’ve come on really strong,” a source in the industry said. 

Added another: “They’re very sharp.”


Florida State NIL collective reported $1.2M in 2022 contributions

The nonprofit corporation Rising Spear Garnet Spirit Inc., which is one of the two arms of the collective Rising Spear that provides NIL opportunities for Florida State athletes, reported receiving more than $1.2 million in contributions in the 2022 fiscal year.

Rising Spear’s nonprofit arm reported $1,249,479 in contributions in its renewal application to the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, which received the application on April 11, 2023. The fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2022.

The application defines contributions as “the promise, pledge, or grant of money or property, financial assistance, or any other thing of value in response to a solicitation.”

“That number accurately reflects the funds raised through our nonprofit,” Rising Spear COO Will Cowen said in a phone interview. “However, that does not account for nearly all the transactions through Rising Spear with our Gold Standard, which is on the for-profit side.”

Rising Spear’s application to renew its nonprofit corporation provides just a partial window into Florida State’s ecosystem of NIL collectives.

“Florida State’s NIL picture is actually a really good one,” Cowen said. “Our nonprofit aspect is only a small fraction of what we’re doing in totality.”

Rising Spear also has a commercial arm called Rising Spear Gold Standard LLC. Plus, another collective called The Battle’s End focuses on Florida State football players. It also includes separate nonprofit and for-profit entities. Micconope 1851 is a for-profit collective powered by Blueprint Sports.

Florida State nonprofit reported $200K in 2021

Rising Spear Garnet Spirit stated its original charitable purpose was, “Working with local college athletes to help further the efforts of the Boys & Girls Club of the Big Bend and other local non-profits.”

In early 2022, Rising Spear’s nonprofit arm reported on its solicitation of contributions application that it received $200,000 in contributions in the fiscal year that ended Dec. 31, 2021. Rising Spear’s directors legally established the nonprofit corporation in early December 2021.

Its proposed budget based on its 2021 fundraising included $182,500 in total expenses. Although, the itemized expenses added up to $186,500. That included $135,000 on “program service expenses” and $51,500 on “management and general expenses.”

When itemized, its management and general expenses included $25,000 in legal fees, $15,000 in fees for service from non-employees and $10,000 in information technology. In April 2023, the law firm Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A. provided the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services with a cover letter and Rising Spear Garnet Spirit’s application for annual renewal.

The application says four Rising Spear directors – Robert DavisAlan FlaumenhaftRobert Frey and Robert Miller – were not compensated.

“The true picture of Florida State NIL is The Battle’s End has two entities as well so you really have four entities,” Cowen said. “You have the two with The Battle’s End and the two with us, and it’s a very powerful formula but it is certainly not weighted into the nonprofit side and that’s by design.”


Friday, June 23, 2023

FSU pushes forward on a bold agenda | President Richard McCullough

 

FSU pushes forward on a bold agenda | President Richard McCullough

It’s a new era at Florida State University, and I’m excited for what the future holds.

Since I began my tenure as president not quite two years ago, I have been laser-focused on investing in our strategic goals and ensuring FSU builds upon our strong foundation as one of the best public universities in the nation.

We’re making distinct progress in continuing the university’s upward trajectory, and I’d like to update the Tallahassee community on some of our recent work and accomplishments. 

  • While we are a major public research university, FSU has long prioritized student success, and our 94% student retention rate and our 74% four-year graduation rate are among the highest in the nation. Our student-focused approach fueled our meteoric rise in the national rankings, and we remain steadfast in our efforts so that every FSU student, regardless of background, graduates with their degree, even as we enhance our focus in other areas of importance.  
  • FSU is expanding its research portfolioby increasing our research expenditures, producing groundbreaking studies and creative works, and launching bold new initiatives. Last year, FSU had a record total of research expenditures of about $355 million, but we’re not stopping there. We aim to grow our research enterprise to exceed $500 million annually. The more money we spend on research not only leads to discoveries that change the world — it also flows into the Florida and Tallahassee economies.  
  • FSU launched the FSU Health initiativelast year with aspirations of transforming health care in North Florida and beyond. As a part of FSU Health, the university is building a deeper partnership with Tallahassee Memorial HealthCare and a major innovation partnership with Mayo Clinic.  
  • FSU’s plans are underway to build a much-needed academic health centerin partnership with Tallahassee Memorial HealthCare on TMH’s campus. We’re also collaborating with TMH and the St. Joe Company to build a new medical campus in Panama City Beach, which will include an urgent care center and a 100-bed hospital. These projects are gamechangers for FSU as they are attracting top-notch faculty in the health care fields and physician-scientists as well as bolstering the university’s growing health research portfolio and upward trend in federal research funding. 
  • FSU is investing over $20 million in quantum science and engineeringover the next three years and will recruit world-class talent to complement our expertise in this area. FSU is already a leader in magnetism thanks to the National MagLab and has excellent programs in materials research. These investments will uniquely position FSU at the forefront of this emerging field of critical national and global importance. 
  • FSU recently announced Fast Start, a new streamlined process designed to help increase the number of faculty start-ups. Fast Start will allow FSU faculty and researchers to execute license agreements more quickly, with fewer roadblocks and delays. This is an important step in accelerating university innovation, which will lead to increased job creation and economic development in the region. 
  • The Florida Legislature allocated unprecedented funding for FSU during this year’s legislative session, including $109 million in new recurring funds and $108 million for capital projects, which will be critical as we continue to advance our top priorities. We are grateful that our legislators and Gov. DeSantis recognize that FSU provides an excellent return on investment for our students and Florida taxpayers. 
  • Every day, we are ambitious and bold, and we push forward on a very big agenda — and every day, I see our progress as we strive for greater excellence. This is an exciting time for FSU with lots of opportunities within our reach and on the horizon, and I assure you, we are just getting started. 

    Richard McCullough

    Richard McCullough is president of Florida State University, one of the top public universities in the nation.

Friday, June 16, 2023

Florida State BOT signs off on request for football center funding

 Florida State Board of Trustees signs off on request for football center funding

The Florida State Board of Trustees signed off Thursday on a request seeking more than $100 million in financing for the school’s new standalone football facility, the Albert J. and Judith A. Dunlap Football Center.

The 150,000-square-foot facility should be complete by July 2025 with an estimated life of the facility of 50 years.

It is expected to get approval from the Florida Board of Governors during its meeting June 21-22 at the University of South Florida.

FSU would then be able to start the project process in September. 

The estimation for the project is now at $138 million.


Additional information shows FSU has already received $28.6 million in donations for the project as of February and another $4.3 million is expected by June 30, 2023.

“FSU anticipates receiving additional donations in Fiscal Years 2024 through 2028, totaling $22.1 million which is expected to be pledged to pay debt service on the Bonds,” it was written in the document.


“Finally, FSU expects to receive $5.8 million in Project donations in Fiscal Years 2029 through 2032. These donations will be available to pay debt service on the Bonds but will not secure the debt.”

FSU broke ground on the project in December with an estimated cost of approximately $100 million and an expectation for construction to be completed in 18-24 months.







2023-2024 state budget approved

 

Largest budget in FSU history: $2.62 billion includes faculty raises, new buildings

Florida State University’s Board of Trustees approved a $2.62 billion operating budget for the 2023-2024 fiscal year — the largest amount in the university’s history.

The record-breaking budget is an increase of 11% from last year, where the annual budget was $2.36 billion and a 9% increase from the year prior’s $2.17 budget.

New buildings will change campus skyline

Regarding capital projects in this year’s budget, some of the highlights include a $40 million allocation for the College of Business’ Legacy Hall that broke ground in October, $35 million for a new Interdisciplinary Research & Commercialization Building and $25 million for FSU’s Academic Health Center that is in the works along with Tallahassee Memorial HealthCare.

Florida State University rendering of Legacy Hall.

On the athletic side of things, $20 million from the budget will be used for the Dunlap Football Operations Facility, $15 million will go toward Doak Campbell Stadium seating enhancements and $10 million will be for the stadium’s Blueprint Project to make accessibility and safety repairs to the 71-year-old Doak Campbell Stadium.  The ongoing initiative has led to concerns and debates about how Blueprint sales tax dollars should be spent.

FSU, FAMU improve in performance-based funding metrics, receiving millions in allocations

Similarly, nine other universities have met the goal this year while most of them also have decreasing rates in the metrics category compared to 2022.

But the same status of being above the 30% threshold cannot be said for FSU and the University of Florida, both of which have not met the minimum access rate requirement for the past six years in a row.

This year, FSU’s access rate is 26% from 26.3% in 2022 while UF’s score is 23.4% from 24.7% last year.

Despite the unwanted continuous trend in the particular category, both FSU and UF remain in the top three scoring universities with the highest number of points this year.

FSU has 94 points — an increase from its score of 90 last year — while UF and USF are tied at 90 points and Florida International University holds the highest score with 95 points.

In addition, FSU will receive $57.5 million in state funding, $48.5 million in institutional funding and an extra $559,930 as a result of being in the top-three realm for a total of $106.7 million.

Here are the metric scores, university investments and state allocations for all 12 universities:

UniversityMetric ScoreUniversity InvestmentState Allocation
Florida International University95$32.8 million$38.9 million
Florida State University94$48.5 million$57.5 million
University of Florida90$57.5 million$68.2 million
University of South Florida90$41.8 million$49.6 million
University of Central Florida89$35.4 million$42 million
Florida Polytechnic University86$4.9 million$5.8 million
Florida Atlantic University82$21.2 million$25.2 million
University of West Florida82$9.8 million$11.7 million
University of North Florida79$13.3 million$15.8 million
Florida A&M University78$13.4 million$15.9 million
Florida Gulf Coast University74$12.2 million$14.5 million
New College of Florida65$3.7 million$0 ($2.1 million held in reserve)

https://news.fsu.edu/news/university-news/2023/06/15/state-budget-provides-critical-support-as-florida-state-university-looks-to-advance-strategic-goals/

The FSU Board of Trustees approved the university's $2.62 billion operating budget for the 2023-2024 fiscal year during their regular meeting Thursday, June 15, 2023. It is the largest operating budget in university history.

Florida State University will receive about $109 million in new recurring operational support along with new funding for several capital projects from the Florida Legislature in the upcoming fiscal year, allowing FSU to further its mission as one of the top public universities in the nation.  

The Florida Legislature approved the 2023-2024 state budget in early May, and Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the spending plan on Thursday morning. Separately on Thursday, the Florida State University Board of Trustees approved the largest operating budget in university history during their regularly scheduled June meeting.  

“Florida State University is laser-focused on reaching our strategic goals — expanding our research portfolio, recruiting and retaining excellent faculty, staff and graduate students, transforming health care in North Florida and continuing to rise in the national rankings,” said President Richard McCullough. “This state funding will be critical as we continue to make investments to advance our top priorities. We are grateful to the Florida Legislature and Gov. DeSantis for recognizing the amazing work happening across our university and the outstanding return-on-investment that FSU provides to our students, the people of Florida and our nation.” 

FSU will receive $60.7 million in new recurring operational enhancement funding that it plans to invest in bolstering research and academic excellence, ensuring student success and expanding its FSU Health initiative as it aims to transform health care in North Florida and beyond.  

In addition, the state appropriated $100 million in new recurring Preeminence funding, which will be split equally between FSU and Florida’s other preeminent universities. The Legislature also increased State University System Performance-based funding for the first time since 2018, and FSU is estimated to receive an additional $15 million over the current year’s total.  

The new state budget also includes: 

  • $20 million (NR) in operational enhancement for National High Magnetic Field Laboratory research 
  • $8 million (NR) for the Florida Institute for Governance and Civics (formerly Institute of Politics) 
  • $1 million (NR) for the Institute for Pediatric Rare Diseases 
  • $1 million (NR) for the College of Law Elections Program 

The state funded several of FSU’s capital appropriation requests, highlighted by $40 million to renovate and redesign research space in the Dittmer Chemistry Lab Building; $30 million toward demolition and relocation of FSU’s 45-year-old maintenance complex; and $10 million in funding toward planning and initial construction of the Veterans Legacy Complex, a project that will better address the unique veteran and military students’ special needs. 

The Legislature also appropriated $20 million in funding for planning and construction of new space for FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Building C, which is needed to accommodate the projected growth of the college’s enrollment and research expansion. 

The university also received $1.5 million for planning and construction of a building that will serve as the cornerstone of an innovative FSU Arts District. The building will provide high-quality space for multiple colleges and departments and create a centralized source of cultural and economic growth for the community. 

Other capital outlay projects that received funding were $4 million for FSU Health – Panama City and $2.3 million for Kellogg Research Building renovations. 

“The Governor, Speaker Paul Renner and Senate President Kathleen Passidomo have put a record amount of funding into the State University System this year and have clearly stated their commitment to higher education in Florida,” said FSU Board of Trustees Chair Peter Collins. “They have also clearly shown their commitment to Florida State University continuing to be one of the top public universities in the country. The Board of Trustees and President McCullough are aligned on the university’s priorities, and we are looking forward to the positive changes that this new funding will allow.”    


BOT Approves Largest Operating Budget in FSU History 

Also on Thursday, the Florida State University Board of Trustees approved the university operating budget for the 2023-2024 fiscal year during their June meeting.  

This year’s operating budget of $2.62 billion is an overall increase of 11%. 

While the operating budget is the largest in university history, Florida State continues to be ranked as one of the most affordable and highest-quality institutions in the nation. The cost of FSU’s tuition has remained unchanged for the past 10 years, and the majority of full-time undergraduates — 87% in the academic year 2021-2022 — receive some form of non-loan student financial aid. 

The operating budget includes new state funding for operational enhancements that FSU plans to invest in increasing research and academic excellence, ensuring student success and expanding its FSU Health initiative as it aims to transform health care in North Florida and beyond. 

The 2023-2024 Annual Operating Budget, estimated to be larger than that of 86 foreign countries, includes allocations for the College of Business’ Legacy Hall, a new Interdisciplinary Research and Commercialization Building, a new Academic Health Center, Athletic Enhancements, Research Facility Upgrades, and a new Football Operations Facility.  

The university’s operating budget injects an estimated $13.7 billion into the local and state economies annually, according to the FSU Center for Economic Forecasting and Analysis. That estimate includes about $4.3 billion in direct revenue or sales and over $178 million in spending by non-resident students, as well as $9.2 billion in lifetime earnings (in 2023 dollars) by recent (FY19-20) FSU graduates, based on the latest draft of the center’s annual report. 

 

https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2023/06/15/desantis-budget-and-vetoes-what-did-tallahassee-fsu-famu-get/70326031007/

The bottom line on the record state budget Gov. Ron DeSantis signed Thursday makes clear state government and higher education drive Tallahassee’s economy. 

The $116 billion state spending plan includes nearly a billion dollars of economic activity for Leon County's 300,000 residents.

The 5% pay raise effective July 1 for the 22,000 state workers in Leon, Gadsden, and Wakulla counties increases the Capital region’s income by more than $43 million – comparable to the economic impact of a year's worth of attendance at Florida State University’s football, basketball, baseball and softball games. 


Florida State University's plans for a $4 million hydrogen research center was rejected by DeSantis.


Florida State University

  • $35,359,083 College of Medicine Alzheimer and dementia research  
  • $30,000,000 Demolition of Mendenhall and site preparation for an academic building 
  • $8,000,000 Institute of Politics to create a statewide history program 
  • $2,126,853 Nursing education 
  • $1,467,667 Financial aid 
  • $1,450,000 Multidisiplinary Educational Services Center 
  • $1,386,508 Autism Center at the College of Medicine 
  • $1,000,000 College of Law Election Law Program 
  • $1,000,000 Institute for Pediatric Rare Diseases 
  • $824,574 Education enhancement College of Medicine 
  • $543,353,819 Education Enhancement Trust Fund grant 
  • $525,000 Child Medical Services Behavioral health 
  • $500,000 Student Veterans Center 
  • $150,000 Center for Rare Earths within the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory 
  • $100,000 Boys and Girls State  






Florida State University — Maybe they’ve got the University of Florida’s number on the gridiron, but they keep finding ways to lose what should be considered a home game — “Choke at the Capitol,” anyone? After landing more funding than UF for probably the first time ever last year, the follow-up effort fizzled as the resurgent Gators lobbying team bounced back this year and fed into their little-brother complex with massive wins in the budget. There is only one Flagship University. All in all, lawmakers approved around $350 million in new funding for the Gators and around $175 million for FSU — it’s basically a 2-to-1 chomping ratio. Go ahead and say it: “It’s Great to be a Florida Gator.”

Thursday, June 15, 2023

Reaction to AAU adds

 


Passed over by Association of American Universities: A goal for decades, FSU wasn't invited

There are currently 71 university members in the group, with 69 from the United States and two from Canada.

The addition of USF makes it the first public university in the state to be invited to join the AAU in nearly 40 years following the University of Florida’s acceptance in 1985.

This also makes USF and UF the only two institutions from Florida’s State University System to serve as AAU members.

News 'a shock' to some Florida State faculty

Attaining AAU membership has been one of FSU President Richard McCullough’s top goals ever since he started his presidency in August 2021, and he has mentioned that ambition during his first State of the University address in January 2022 as well as in his second one in November.

The United Faculty of Florida’s FSU Chapter President Matthew Lata says he is not incredibly familiar with the AAU's metrics, but he said it was “a shock” to find out that USF was invited while FSU was not.

FSU's desire to become a part of the AAU follows its overarching goal of tapping into the country’s top 15 public universities as it is currently ranked no. 19 on the list, according to the U.S. News & World Report.

USF is currently ranked No. 42 in the same category.

In addition, while FSU has a 74% four-year graduation rate, USF has a 60% rate.

But as public universities, there is one thing that both USF and UF have, which could be a major contributor to their AAU bragging right, that FSU does not currently have — teaching hospitals.

FSU has plans of its own in the health and research sector with an FSU Health-Academic Health Center initiative that could potentially catch AAU’s attention in the future once completed in a couple of years.

For decades, FSU has tried to join the AAU club

Although being a part of the AAU has been one of McCullough’s priorities during his past year as president, the goal has been top of mind for FSU’s presidents for years.

During former FSU President Bernie Sliger’s 15-year tenure from 1976 to 1991, the university gained many groundbreaking additions, which included being awarded the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, acquiring FSU’s first three supercomputers and establishing the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering as the only shared engineering school in the nation — all accomplishments that were expected to play a role in helping FSU get one step closer to qualifying for AAU membership.

AAU selects USF in stunning rebuke of FSU: Where is the accountability?


USF and FSU have long sought membership in the AAU.  FSU entered the competition with notable advantages. A vibrant national brand, a three-year head start on preeminence funding from the state, unique and broad excellence across disciplines, research, and professions.

Starting in 2015, FSU leadership (Board of Trustees Chair Ed Burr, President John Thrasher, Provost Sally McRorie, and Vice-President for Research Gary Ostrander) secured resources and set ambitious goals that inspired administrators, faculty, staff, and students on a quest for national prominence.  In a few short years, FSU broke into the ranks of the U.S. News & World Report Top 20 public universities.  It was a rocket ride, with every metric pointing in the right direction.  AAU membership was within sight.


https://www.on3.com/boards/threads/fsu-and-the-aau.976561/#post-17272769

National Science Foundation - Rankings by total R&D expenditures:

Florida State U. #83 9.9 $328,604,000*
Clemson U. #107 12.6 $237,485,000

*Note: FSU was $356,000,000 for 2022.

Note:
U. South Florida #68 8.3 $405,088,000
U. Miami #75 9.1 $375,84,000
U. Notre Dame #106 12.4 $240,324,000


Based on the above, assuming R&D expenditures are a big factor, maybe FSU is closer to AAU membership than we think.

AAU institutions:

U. Missouri, Columbia 71 8.6 388,77
U. Kansas 72 8.7 385,637
Dartmouth C. 82 9.8 330,226
Brown U. 96 11.4 276,331
SUNY, Stony Brook U. 98 11.6 274,516
George Washington U., The 101 11.9 266,108
U. California, Santa Barbara 104 12.2 248,961
Tufts U. 110 12.9 224,956
Tulane U. 119 13.9 205,206
U. California, Riverside 133 15.4 189,600
U. California, Santa Cruz 142 16.4 160,615
U. Oregon 149 17.1 139,193
Brandeis U. 165 18.9 107,549

Note: I would think the following would also be strong AAU candidates:

North Carolina State U. 53 6.7 547,118 (#72 US News)
VaTech: 54 6.8 542,045 (#62 US News)
UGA: 57 7.1 493,944 (#49 US News)

Per the AAU site, it's based on federal research, not total research. They also consider per-faculty measures, so even if a university does less research than FSU, they still might be "weighted" higher due to being a smaller school with less faculty.

AAU Membership Indicators​

The AAU presidents and chancellors have adopted the following set of membership indicators to use in assessments of the U.S. current and potential new members. All indicators will be tabulated as both actual values and normalized, per-faculty measures where feasible.

Phase I Indicators​

  1. Competitively funded federal research support: The Membership Committee uses National Science Foundation (NSF) research expenditure data, excluding formula-allocated USDA research expenditures. Funding for the Agriculture Food and Research Initiative (AFRI), a competitively funded USDA research support program, is included in the Phase I research support indicator.


AAU MEMBERSHIP INDICATORS: Data Sources​

Phase I Indicators

Competitively funded federal research support: federal R&D expenditures

A ten-year average of federal research expenditures (including S&E and non-S&E) adjusted to exclude USDA formula-allocated research expenditures. This indicator includes obligations for the AFRI program funded by USDA. Expenditures for Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab were excluded.

  • National Science Foundation (NSF) Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges/Higher Education Research and Development Survey (HERD), data for the most recently available ten-year average. Table Builder | NCSES | NSF .
  • AFRI Obligations, data for the ten years that match the years from HERD. USASpending.gov - Federal Awards | Advanced Search | USAspending.




There are other "indicators" used as well beyond just research. It's not as straight-forward as the stats you provided. You would need to normalize the data between all the schools you listed to account for that. The AAU also seems to favor NIH (HHS) and NSF over other federal sources. On the NSF site, it links to each individual school, and you can see their "federally funded, by agency: 2021–12", though - while I'm not sure - I assume that includes the "formula-allocated USDA" research which does not count towards AAU.

If you want to see something that is nuts, look at the "Research Space" rankings from the NSF.

If you ever had any doubt whatsoever that uf monopolized State of Florida higher education taxpayer dollars for decades, then look no further than these rankings:

Institution Rank Percentile Research Space
Florida 1 1 4,900,656
U. South Florida 85 15.3 799,485
U. Central Florida 101 18 706,596
Florida International U. 124 21.9 561,767
Florida State U. 145 25.5 461,800
Florida Atlantic U. 180 31.4 291,338
Florida Institute of Technology 211 36.7 234,776
Florida A&M U. 232 40.3 207,012
U. North Florida 244 42.3 184,635
Florida Gulf Coast U. 259 44.9 150,689
U. West Florida 430 74 49,989
Florida Polytechnic University 526 90.3 17,598


uf has managed to secure enough State of Florida taxpayer funding to construct facilities to the point that uf literally has the most research space in the entire nation. For those keeping score, uf has 10X the research space of FSU and 6X of the second-most university in Florida, USF.

Absolutely ridiculous. Note: I am sure this statistic takes into consideration every single UF-IFAS facility in every county in the State of Florida, but it is still completely inequitable.

The interesting thing I see is that FSU lags behind USF, UCF and even FIU.

Crazy.

It suffices to say that FSU has not done well here historically.

BUT you can see why it is so important to President McCollough to get those new medical campuses going in Leon and Bay county. The Tallahassee medical facility alone will add 130,000 gross square feet of medical and research-related space. I am not sure how much of the Panama City facility will be research space, but that will be a 80,000-square-foot facility.

Plus, FSU is also already constructing the Interdisciplinary Research and Commercialization Building. That's another 116,000-square-feet of dedicated research space. FSU broke ground on that facility in 2021, and substantial completion is expected in '24.

The author implies that FSU’s better US News Ranking and graduation rate are factors in AAU membership and then says “as public universities, there is one thing that both USF and UF have, which could be a major contributor to their AAU bragging right, that FSU does not currently have — teaching hospitals.”

Plus, If you go to the NSF website linked , you can see that USF leads FSU in most categories:

Earned Doctorates
FSU #49
USF #55

Doctoral Students
FSU #66
USF #44

R&D Expenditures
FSU #83
USF #68

Research Space
FSU #145
USF #85

The fact is that USF is ahead of FSU in most AAU factors. And nearly all of that is because of USF’s medical school.

https://strategicplan.fsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/2023-2027-Strategic-Plan.pdf



Here is a ranking of world universities that talks about research in terms of quality.
FSU 250th
ND 300th


https://csnbbs.com/thread-970967-page-3.html

AAU Membership by FBS Conference
B1G: 15
ACC: 8
Pac12: 8
SEC: 5
AAC: 3
Big12: 1
MAC: 1

Big Ten will be at 15 when USC/UCLA come in. The only exception is Nebraska.

Michigan and Wisconsin themselves voted Nebraska out of the AAU only months after inviting them to the Big Ten. If Michigan and Wisconsin hadn’t voted that way, Nebraska wouldn’t have been removed. (This is further evidence that the true academic snobs in the Big Ten are Michigan and Wisconsin as opposed to Northwestern. Northwestern is confident in its academic stature no matter what happens to them, but Michigan and Wisconsin have to be more outwardly and publicly exclusive.)

My mistake, its 15

Big Ten = 15
Rutgers, USC, UCLA, Ohio State, Penn State, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan State, Michigan, Minnesota, Northwestern, Wisconsin, Purdue, Indiana

ACC = 8
Pitt, Duke, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Boston College, North Carolina, Notre Dame, Miami

Pac-12 = 8
Cal, Stanford, Washington, Colorado, Arizona, Utah, Oregon, Arizona State

SEC = 5
Texas A&M, Vanderbilt, Texas, Mizzou, Florida

AAU = 3
Rice, Tulane, USF

Big 12 = 1
Kansas

MAC = 1
Buffalo

The full list of UC AAC schools is:

University of California, Davis (1996)
University of California, Berkeley (1900)
University of California, Irvine (1996)
University of California, Los Angeles (1974)
University of California, Riverside (2023)
University of California, San Diego (1982)
University of California, Santa Barbara (1995)
University of California, Santa Cruz (2019)


FUTURE ADDS?

This leaves 10 universities that are R1 private, but not AAU.

Baylor University
Boston College
Drexel University
George Washington University
Georgetown University
Northeastern University
Syracuse University
University of Denver
University of Miami
University of Notre Dame
...
There are definitely quite a few undeserving, legacy AAU public universities, which I will list below (personal opinion), and it is largely my impression on their academic reputation and ranking:

University of Missouri (should be out)
University of Oregon (should be out)
University of Kansas (should be out)
Iowa State University (should be out)
Stony Brook (should be out)

I believe 2 universities that are not invited are way better than those listed above as "should be out" category, they are follows and are likely to get invites:

University of Georgia
NC State

Some honorable mentions here, unlikely but worth a look. Many of these have some fatal flows though, but who knows.

University of South Florida
University of Tennessee
University of Connecticut
Florida State University
Arizona State University
University of Illinois Chicago
Virginia Tech
UT Dallas

Good to see that the AAU admitted a number of schools from the broader, underrepresented south…GW, USF and Miami. The surprise is that USF likely beat out NC State (even UGA, VT and FSU also seemed to be more frequently mentioned as viable candidates).

AAU schools by state.

California 8.
Florida 3. UF, Miami, USF
Texas 3. Texas, A&M, Rice

My home state (Pennsylvania) has four AAU members, Massachusetts & New York have five each.

UAB and Florida state seem like the next up since it’s seems like the south is underrepresented, this is after all a lobbying group

Top ARWU-ranked schools not in the AAU after today's additions...


Georgetown is the only USN&WR Top 25 school not in the AAU and one of just three in the Top 50 not included. It has more research expenditures than nine of the current members (and three of the newcomers), ranks 55th in graduate student population and ranks 7th in public policy research,. However, it has no engineering school. Is that a deal-breaker?

(all numbers roughly EOY 2021)

The University of Texas system has an endowment of ~$42.1B.
The Texas A&M University system has an endowment of ~$18B.
The University of Houston is $1.3B.
Texas Tech University System is $1.5B.

(Privates for reference - TCU is $2.2B, Baylor is $2B)

The University of California system endowment is $12.1B (though schools like UCLA have a separate $4B endowment, UC Berkley is $2.9B).

The University of Florida is $2.4B.
Florida State is $0.9B.
The University of Miami is $1.4B.
USF is $0.9B.
UCF is $0.25B.

----------

Texas doesn't have a lack of money problem, it has a prioritization problem. You couldn't spread the PUF too thin, there's $60B between the top two Texas publics (compared to like $25B-$30B all in for all the UC schools together).

California is the gold standard. Florida is doing a phenomenal job. Texas (the state), having this level of public university development despite having at least double the funds of the gold standard is a complete embarrassment.




2010 is a while back, but this is how the AAU rated institutions at that point. AAU members are not identified by name. The asterisks indicate schools that have been added since then.
I did not list the # for the AAU schools in the list under #52 as they were all but 9 of those first 51. UAB, UMBC are probably not in because their rank is primarily medical schools. I don't know about UMBC, but UAB has an outstanding medical school. Rockefeller, UCSF and Yeshiva are specialized schools and don't qualify.

1 Rockefeller University
2 UC-San Francisco
31 Georgia Tech ***
31 Yeshiva University
37 Dartmouth ***
37 Boston College ***

40 Alabama Birmingham
43 Tufts ***
43 Maryland-Baltimore County
49 Utah ***
52 UC-Santa Cruz ***

54 AAU
55 AAU
55 RPI
57 Wake Forest
58 AAU
59 AAU
59 Miami FL ***
61 Illinois-Chicago
62 Cincinnati
64 Colorado St.
67 Oregon St.
68 George Washington ***
69 New Mexico
69 AAU
71 AAU
72 Wayne St.
72 UC-Riverside ***
74 AAU
74 AAU
75 AAU
76 Alaska-Fairbanks
78 Virginia Commonwealth
79 Vermont
79 Hawaii
81 Connecticut
81 AAU
83 AAU
83 Georgetown
83 Delaware
86 SUNY-Albany
87 Arizona St. ***
87 South Florida ***
87 AAU probably lowest ranking existing AAU member
90 Massachusetts
91 Virginia Tech
91 North Carolina St.
91 Oklahoma
94 AAU (probably Iowa St. who dropped out in 2022)
94 Florida St.
96 Louisville
96 Kentucky
98 New Mexico St.
99 Notre Dame ***
100 Mississippi
101 Massachusetts
102 New Hampsire
103 South Carolina
104 Houston
105 AAU (probably Syracuse who dropped out in 2010)
105 Utah St.
105 Nevada
105 Howard
109 AAU-Nebraska-voted out in 2010


Basic research is overwhelmingly about tapping into Federal spending. Looking at rankings of university R&D expenditures…

https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/profiles/site?...ce&ds=herd

In absolute $$ R&D expenditures:
USF ranked between 41 - 77 during the past decade.
FSU ranked between 75 - 94 during the past decade.

FSU is clearly not “far, far, far stronger” at Federal lobbying. The only unbiased measure of strength is the ability to win Federal research grants. At least over the past decade, USF has been much more successful by the most important metric.

If we look at FSU's research spending and it's growing by 5% per year while all the other publics eyeing the AAU are growing by 1-2% per year, then that's mighty impressive. But, if FSU is growing their spending by 5% per year while several others are growing by 8 or 9% per year, then that's perhaps not as impressive.