Tuesday, February 25, 2014

ACC TV Ratings (2011 data at bottom)

2014 Syracuse/Duke ESPN

"ESPN reported that the game averaged 4,745,000 viewers, making it the third-most watched college basketball game in the network's history (the ACC also claims most-watched game, as the North Carolina-Duke contest on March 8, 2008, drew an audience of 5,612,000).
The game drew the highest shares in the North Carolina Triad and Research Triangle markets, and the telecast also set records in Buffalo (6.7 local rating) and New York City (2.8 rating) to rank as ESPN's highest-rated regular-season men's college hoops game in both markets (records date back to 2002)."


2011 Data





Saturday, February 22, 2014

Barron Debate

Barron Debate

jrfsu-"Numbers alone can be deceiving in my opinion. Fundraising: No. Eric Barron never oversaw the raising of $100 million in a single year. But to my pretty informed knowledge no Florida State president ever raised $100 million in a fiscal year without millions of state matching gift dollars putting them over the top. As important, no Florida State president ever raised money in an economy - and most notably during a Florida real estate market collapse - quite like the one in which Barron operated for most of his tenure. You may also recall that Charles Rasberry in just three years proved a huge disaster and was forced out of the FSU Foundation presidency in mid-2009. Barron found a Lee Hinkle appointed Leon Co. based computer sales guy serving as interim FSU Foundation president when he arrived. (I'm not kidding.) Barron quickly created (a long over due) University VP for Development position and recruited a UVA development executive for the job. They seem to be doing a nice job over there stabilizing operations and reorganizing in anticipation of the campaign. By the way, capital campaigns are not typically five years in duration. Campaigns are most often five to seven years of public fundraising. Every campaign has a significant quiet phase. Though many of us know about the campaign, Florida State's technically in the quiet phase. The goal of this phase is to raise about half the funds. My understanding from folks in the know is that we've currently raised more than 50% (or more than $500 million) of the $1 billion goal and that the public kickoff is scheduled to occur this October. I am unsure whether Barron's departure will cause a delay to the public launch. Legislative performance metrics: One more point would have tied Florida State for third. Only two more points would have run us up yet higher. My limited understanding is that because one-third of our alumni live outside the state - unlike FIU, UCF and USF - a couple measures suffered quite negatively. (BTW, those "metrics" are in my opinion the typical variety of horse poo one routinely expects from Florida politicians and certainly no way to evaluate a university.) Research Funding: I am but a mere Ph.D. candidate, but it seems pretty difficult to raise research funding levels at a time your institution is hemorrhaging an average of 50 faculty members every year to institutions who can pay more. I have no idea whether Gary Ostrander was a good hire or not, but I am personally willing to give him some time in light of circumstances."
pauldirac-"I stand by my claim: By the metrics that matter for AAU membership Barron was not the great president for FSU that many on the faculty seem to be making him out to be. It is naive to cal Barron a great president for FSU given his short tenure and lack of performance on any relevant metrics. Would have been if he had stayed on 10 years? Perhaps, but we will never know. I know of no major initiative Barron launched related to research, academics or fundraising that has shown tangible improvement on any of the AAU metrics. He was a great guy at facilitating discussions about things, and Ostrander may prove to be a great hire (the jury is still out on that), but I did not see Barron make any major decisions to advance or improve the research focus at FSU. I certainly did not see FSU's research performance grow as much as our competitors did over time he was in the president's seat. Please correct me if I am wrong about this. I am not saying Barron was a terrible president. He did some some ground work to help FSU get ready to advance towards becoming an AAU university, and he calmed the turmoil after TK by appeasing faculty senate and union leaders, but we certainly did not see FSU make strides or advancement in research under his watch. Nor did I see any tangibles goals set by Barron or anyone else related to research. A lot could have happened at FSU with engineering, medicine, research funding and faculty hiring over the past 4 years but Barron definitely has taken a go slow and don't rock the boat approach at FSU. I am not saying he was terrible. But by the conventional metrics people look look at in evaluating university performance he definitely did not transform FSU in the research and academic arenas or blow people away with his fundraising ability. By any measure I am aware of he was just average. I don't see $1 billion as ambitious for FSU given the number of alumni we have, though I agree it is ambitious for FSU given its weak fundraising culture. State universities with far fewer living alumni than FSU have achieved this many times over. Maybe Barron was working on some big gifts, and perhaps he was almost ready to close the deal on that $50 or $100 million dollar gift that would put FSU in the same category as its peers, but again we will never know. "
jrfsu-"The fundraising numbers cited in the above post are pulled from FSU Foundation annual reports. What the poster failed to note is that fundraising totals listed in Foundation annual reports published before 2009 included Seminole Booster fundraising. Foundation annual reports published since 2009 list only FSU Foundation fundraising totals. As I already mentioned reported numbers also fail to acknowledge that before 2009 MILLIONS of FSU Foundation raised dollars came from State Matching gift program (from the state legislature) and ignores that Ringling gifts inflated FSU Foundation fundraising totals in many years. See below for better explanation: FY 2013: Of the nearly $70 million raised by just the FSU Foundation. A) $0 came from state matching funds from legislature. B) Ringling accounted for just $2.9 million. FY 2012: Of the $50 million raised by just the FSU Foundation. A) $0 came from state matching funds from legislature. B) Ringling accounted for just $2.3 million. FY 2011: Of the $51 million raised by just the FSU Foundation. A) $0 came from state matching funds from legislature. B) Ringling accounted for just $1.3 million. 2010: Of the almost $52 million raised by just the FSU Foundation. A) $0 came from state matching funds from legislature. B) Ringling accounted for only about $2.5 million. 2009: Of the $39 million raised by just FSU Foundation. A) $0 in state matching funds from legislature. B) Ringling raised just $330 thousand. 2008: Of the $96 million raised by the FSU Foundation and Seminole Boosters: A) $17.5 million of the FSU Foundation's total derived from state matching funds from the legislature. B) $28.5 million were Ringling gifts. C) $32 million were Booster gifts. 2007: Of the $60 million raised by the FSU Foundation and Seminole Boosters: A) $15 million of the FSU Foundation's total derived from state matching funds from the legislature. B) $5 million were Ringling gifts. C) $6 million were Booster gifts. 2006: Of the record $113 million raised by the FSU Foundation and Seminole Boosters: A) $2.5 million of the FSU Foundation's total came from state matching funds from the legislature; B) $40 million were gifts to Ringling; C) $18.5 million were Booster gifts; 2005: Of the $97 million raised by the FSU Foundation and Seminole Boosters: A) $15.5 million of the FSU Foundation's total came from state matching funds from the legislature. B) $11 million to Ringling. C) $32 million to Boosters."

Friday, February 21, 2014

FSU Presidents Data

These are some very interesting figures IMHO and more often than not, counter many of the claims you see on FSU message boards everywhere.


Below are NACUBO endowment figures and rankings for FSU presidents during their tenure.


2010-2013 Trend (Barron Years)
Rank Increase Avg. % Increase Avg. $ Increase Total $ Increase
FSU (12) 7.88% $34,607.25 $138,429.00
UF (3) 7.93% $87,263.25 $349,053.00
UM (3) 10.03% $59,835.25 $239,341.00
USF (12) 7.53% $22,131.50 $88,526.00
FAU (7) 7.63% $11,753.25 $47,013.00
UCF - 10.88% $10,877.75 $43,511.00
FAMU (23) 7.30% $6,877.75 $27,511.00
FIU 3 13.30% $13,531.25 $149,384.00



2003-2009 Trend (TK Years)
Rank Increase Avg. % Increase Avg. $ Increase Total $ Increase
FSU (8) 4.59% $12,081.14 $75,916.00
UF 25 9.24% $61,026.14 $424,895.00
UM (4) 4.64% $15,950.14 $126,988.00
USF (21) 3.51% $6,295.29 $26,742.00
FAU 29 7.13% $6,709.14 $48,189.00
UCF 38 9.54% $5,630.71 $37,528.00


1994-2002 Trend (Sandy Years)
Rank Increase Avg. % Increase Avg. $ Increase Total $ Increase
FSU 128 21.58% $29,489.44 $265,059.00



US News Highest Rankings Per President


Overall Public
Barron 97 42
TK 102 50
Sandy 88 40


Total Research Dollars Per President
*These figures do not factor in inflation (ie Sandy is most disadvantaged here in a direct comparison). 

% Increase Dollar Increase
Barron -12% ($25,000,000)
TK 24% $38,200,000
Sandy 117% $79,778,401


FSU 'Gift' totals to FSU per year/per president according to FSU Foundation
*These figures do not factor in inflation (ie Sandy is most disadvantaged due to this item).
*In 2009, FSU ceased factoring in Seminole Booster donations (ie Barron is most disadvantaged due to this item)

% Increase Gift Average Total Gifts
Barron 34.62% $55,724,176 $222,896,704
TK -39.51% $78,362,918 $548,540,424
Sandy 366.41% $66,049,211 $594,442,896

Thursday, February 20, 2014

FSU New President News - TK Part 2?

Some disturbing rumors about FSU repeating their mistake of hiring another politician as their president.

TK did many things for FSU as a politician, much like John Thrasher has, but this does not equal a qualification to serve as president for a research university. Sadly, in Tallahassee, all that is truly needed is membership to the 'good ole boy' club. FSU paid the price for TK's presidency, and it looks like it is going back for seconds.

If there is any doubt, loyal Seminoles might find this interesting:

Trustee for FSU lobbies for UCF

TALLAHASSEE - Five years ago, then-House Speaker John Thrasher led the battle to add a medical school to Florida State University.
His fight was successful but not without controversy. It led to the dissolution of the state's Board of Regents after they refused to sign off on the plan.
Now, Thrasher is fighting for another medical school and again it has brought controversy.
This time he has been hired as a lobbyist by the University of Central Florida in Orlando, raising eyebrows among some at FSU, where Thrasher is a member of the board of trustees.
"I'm not very comfortable with it," said J. Stanley Marshall, former president of FSU and a member of the Board of Governors, which replaced the Board of Regents as the overseer of the state's 11-university system.
Thrasher tried to schedule a meeting with Marshall to discuss the proposed medical school, but Marshall refused, saying he preferred to get a non-biased opinion.
"I told him I didn't think it would be a very good use of his time," Marshall said.
Others have questioned whether it's a conflict for a trustee to lobby the higher education community, a practice Senate President Tom Lee tried to wipe out last year with a bill banning lobbyists from serving as university trustees.
But Thrasher, president of the Southern Strategy Group lobbying firm, said he doesn't think he's doing anything wrong.
"I think as far as a medical school goes, there's enough resources for all of them to exist," he said. "There's a definite need."
Both UCF and Florida International University in Miami are asking the Board of Governors for permission to build medical schools, bringing the state's total to five.
It's an expensive proposition. According to a proposal presented by the universities to the Board of Governors, each school would require about $20-million a year to operate. Some board members have questioned whether the cost is justified.
Officials from UCF and FIU argue the medical schools would address a rapidly growing doctor deficit in the state.
Thrasher is one of eight lobbyists registered to represent the University of Central Florida Foundation.
Dan Holsenbeck, a University of Central Florida vice president, said none of the lobbyists can discuss the medical school with legislators until it is approved by the Board of Governors.
However, they have been encouraged to talk to board members.
"We told them that if you have a personal relationship with a member of the Board of Governors, then by all means express your support," Holsenbeck said. "We've asked them to find out what the issues are so we can address them."
Thrasher said he's met with a couple members of the Board of Governors and that the university gave him several "specific, targeted" tasks, although he declined to discuss them.
He said he hasn't heard from anyone from FSU voicing displeasure about his dual role.
But Dr. Raymond Bellamy, a Tallahassee physician who teaches at the FSU Medical School, said Thrasher is violating the spirit of the law passed earlier this year prohibiting lobbyists from serving as university trustees.
The law was proposed last January by Lee, who said he wanted to build a "fire wall" between the Legislature and the state university system.
The new law, which took effect in June, does not apply to current trustees, including Thrasher. But Bellamy said it still looks like a conflict.
"I don't know if there should be another medical school, but this is the wrong way to find out," Bellamy said. "It should be done by study and careful analysis."
Others from FSU say they don't see anything wrong with Thrasher's position, including Jim Smith, former attorney general and chairman of FSU's board of trustees.
"The fact is, the truth is, we got ours through raw politics, so we have no room to object if somebody else does the same thing," he said. "It would be hypocritical in my opinion."

ACC Conference Financial Data

This is the ACC per team payout against other P5 conferences. Keep in mind, this is only money distributed by conferences. Some conferences (ie Big 12) have individual teams keep more of their own tier 3 rights, so that money is not factored in. It is difficult to accurately compare these numbers, so again, this just averages the monies distributed by conferences.

Diff vs ACC-Total Diff vs ACC-As % 2012-2011 2011-2010
ACC Per Team $18,200,000 $16,900,000
SEC Per Team ($2,600,000) 87.50% $20,800,000 $20,400,000
Big 12 Per Team ($3,800,000) 82.73% $22,000,000 $12,000,000
PAC Per Team ($2,800,000) 86.67% $21,000,000 $11,100,000
BIG Per Team ($7,500,000) 70.82% $25,700,000 $23,800,000



This is the breakdown of ACC revenue with the percentage of each line item to overall revenue.


ACC % of revenue 2012-2011 2011-2010 2010-2009 2009-2008
Revenue $223,500,000 $167,200,000 $158,200,000 $172,700,000
FB TV Rights 58.39% $130,500,000 $42,800,000 $41,700,000 $41,600,000
Basketball TV Rights #VALUE! N/A $36,500,000 $35,900,000 $35,300,000
Bowl Games 19.60% $43,800,000 36,700,000 31,600,000 30,700,000
NCAA Bball Tourney 7.92% $17,700,000 $18,200,000 $18,200,000 $15,900,000
NCAA Grant in Aid 4.21% $9,400,000
ACC Bball Tourney 2.28% $5,100,000 N/A N/A $13,100,000


The table below is ACC per team conference payout over 4 years with Total amount and the variation against FSU's payout.




 
Diff vs FSU TOTAL 2013-2012 2012-2011 2011-2010 2010-2009
Clemson $900,000 $56,500,000 $18,600,000 $12,400,000 $12,000,000 $13,500,000
Va Tech $4,300,000 $59,900,000 $18,500,000 $14,100,000 $11,900,000 $15,400,000
UVA ($3,500,000) $52,100,000 $17,400,000 $11,200,000 $11,000,000 $12,500,000
UNC $0 $55,600,000 $17,300,000 $12,500,000 $12,000,000 $13,800,000
Wake Forest ($3,400,000) $52,200,000 $17,000,000 $11,000,000 $10,800,000 $13,400,000
NC State ($1,600,000) $54,000,000 $17,000,000 $12,600,000 $10,900,000 $13,500,000
Ga Tech $400,000 $56,000,000 $16,900,000 $12,300,000 $13,400,000 $13,400,000
FSU $55,600,000 $16,900,000 $13,100,000 $12,000,000 $13,600,000
Maryland ($2,600,000) $53,000,000 $16,000,000 $12,300,000 $11,000,000 $13,700,000
Duke ($4,700,000) $50,900,000 $15,900,000 $11,300,000 $11,100,000 $12,600,000
BC ($1,300,000) $54,300,000 $15,800,000 $12,500,000 $12,300,000 $13,700,000
Miami ($2,000,000) $53,600,000 $15,700,000 $12,200,000 $12,100,000 $13,600,000

Football drives 80% of ACC revenue

Emails show UNC doubts about ACC after Maryland’s departure

The records request, which The News & Observer filed in February, sought emails and other documents between November 2012 and February 2013. During one exchange, Cunningham expressed concern about the ACC’s ability to compete financially with other conferences.


Joe Frierson, a financial adviser from Athens, Ga., and a former UNC tennis player and assistant tennis coach, wrote Cunningham on Dec. 7, 2012, about a lunch meeting Frierson had with an SEC athletic director.

“He said the SEC pays out around $20 (million per) team right now,” Frierson wrote. “Thinks it will approach $35 (million per team) when TV contract is renegotiated in a couple of years.

“He said the SEC just signed a contract for the Sugar Bowl (between teams from the SEC and Big 12) for 2015 that will pay $40 (million) to each conference. … That is ridiculous money.”

Cunningham’s response was short and direct: “It really concerns me. If these trends continue I’m not sure how the ACC (can) compete financially.”

Clemson Athletic Director: 80% Of ACC's Revenue From New Contract w/ ESPN Is Football

"Wow! I knew it was high, but, not that high. Swofford also said something similar last week: "Swofford estimated that football drives 70-80 percent of rights fees""

New 15-year ESPN contract increases ACC media revenue by 30 percent

"Swofford estimated that football drives 70-80 percent of rights fees and acknowledged that more national success in that sport would have meant additional revenue."

Q&A with Clemson AD

Sunday, February 9, 2014

FSU Athletic Endowment (2008-2012)

A subset of our FSU endowment figures (NACUBO). These figures are extremely difficult to find. Most of these are estimates. With that said, athletic endowments are extremely good measures of an athletic department's health. Some of these schools might be surprising. Many ACC schools are extremely strong financially, but it often doesn't show on the football field. One could argue it isn't from a lack of resources, but perhaps from a lack of willingness to use them on football.


2008-2012

2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
FSU $40,700,000 $30,000,000
FSU (Foundation Figures)
Stanford $600,000,000 $410,000,000 $520,000,000
Notre Dame $270,000,000
North Carolina $212,000,000 $212,000,000 $180,000,000
USC
Duke $140,000,000 $150,717,426 $150,000,000
Texas A&M
Virginia $61,873,981
Michigan
Cal
Florida
Indiana
Missouri $28,000,000
Va Tech
Clemson
NC State
Maryland
Boston College $100,000,000 $100,000,000
Ga Tech $65,000,000 $30,000,000 $80,058,950
UGA $51,000,000
Ohio State $46,139,682
Auburn
LSU
Texas
PSU $49,390,069


FSU Athletic Endowment (2003-2007)

A subset of our FSU endowment figures (NACUBO). These figures are extremely difficult to find. Most of these are estimates. With that said, athletic endowments are extremely good measures of an athletic department's health. Some of these schools might be surprising. Many ACC schools are extremely strong financially, but it often doesn't show on the football field. One could argue it isn't from a lack of resources, but perhaps from a lack of willingness to use them on football.


2003-2007

2007 2006 2005 2003
FSU $26,000,000 $25,000,000 $18,200,000
FSU (Foundation Figures) 30,343,634 26,405,000 25,048,000 22,829,000 18,195,000
Stanford $374,900,000 $270,000,000
Notre Dame $130,000,000
North Carolina $106,000,000
USC $100,000,000
Duke $149,000,000 $63,000,000
Texas A&M $45,000,000
Virginia $35,000,000
Michigan $31,700,000
Cal $30,000,000
Florida $42,000,000 $24,100,000
Indiana $32,000,000
Missouri
Va Tech $20,300,000
Clemson $12,000,000
NC State $12,000,000
Maryland $9,000,000
Boston College
Ga Tech
UGA $18,000,000
Ohio State $17,000,000
Auburn $5,600,000
LSU $6,000,000
Texas $18,500,000
PSU $21,300,000

Saturday, February 8, 2014

ACC Fall Meeting Rumors


Nine-game league schedule still possible for ACC football, but divisions appear set


ACC Fall Meeting rumors

JMGNole on 1/27/2014

Don't trust every rumor, but some posters make me think twice more than others:

"ACC Stuff
Expect ND full time by 2017, with the NBC contract with ND still be in place.  They would not be fully supplemented by the ACC media deal, till the NBC deal is done.  For instance, if they get the estimated ~12M from NBC, and ABC is paying ~24M per school, ND would only get ~12M of that, or the difference.
ND wants a game in Florida every year, which means FSU and Miami would be two nearly certain conference games.  It's also possible that an ACC team might play them on a neutral field in Florida. This is one of the reasons for the proposed reshuffling of the conference, and who plays in the ACCCG.

Big question is who 16th ACC team will be.  No one seems to lead this race.
ACC Bowl payouts are changing as well, but nothing is finalized yet.

FSU obviously has the most juice in the conference right now. 

National Stuff

The B1G, PAC-12, SEC, ACC, Big 12 Conferences are maneuvering for the Super 5 for the playoffs, and if you're not in one of those, you're on the outside looking in.
There will be a pot of cash that the top five will draw from, which will bring the payouts to within 15% or so of each other.

The playoff field will probably expand to eight, timetable to be determined."

FSU Endowment

Endowment rankings are one of the best, if not the best, barometers of a university's health.  Universities in the state of Florida are literally decades behind much of the U.S. with this particular tool used by successful higher education institutions.  The comparison below was done with Florida institutions, but keep in mind, all of them are well behind their non Florida peers, for the most part.


Endowment rankings are based on National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) 



Fiscal Year 2013

2012-2013 Ranking 2013 2012 % Change
FSU150 $548,095$497,70910.10%
UF 58 $1,359,643 $1,263,277 7.60%
UM 103 $777,947 $678,694 14.60%
USF 196 $363,924 $334,132 8.90%
FAU 292 $189,287 $172,231 9.90%
UCF 359 $135,462 $122,609 10.50%
FAMU 398 $115,281 $107,743 7.00%
FIU 341 $149,384 $132,554 12.70%