Monday, September 12, 2022

National MagLab magnet recognized with R&D 100 award

 

National MagLab magnet recognized with R&D 100 award

Engineers and technicians from the Florida State University-headquartered National High Magnetic Field Laboratory were recognized with a 2022 R&D 100 Award for the design and construction of the 32 tesla (T) Superconducting Magnet. The R&D 100 recognizes revolutionary ideas in science and technology, and the 32T magnet is the world’s most powerful all-superconducting magnet.

“This award is a major accomplishment and positions this innovation in magnet technology at the highest echelon of achievement,” said FSU President Richard McCullough. “We are incredibly proud of the scientists and engineers at the MagLab for their hard work and ingenuity in designing and building this extraordinary piece of technology that will really move us forward in our understanding of complex materials and quantum science.”

Often referred to as “The Oscars of Innovation,” the R&D 100 Awards is the only science and technology awards competition that recognizes new commercial products, technologies and materials for their technological significance that are available for sale or license. Presented by R&D World magazine, the R&D 100 Awards program identifies and celebrates the top 100 revolutionary technologies of the past year.

The 32T all-superconducting magnet is the first of its kind and was funded by the National Science Foundation’s Division of Materials Research and the State of Florida. The magnet is composed of an outer set of traditional commercial low-temperature superconducting coils and a novel set of inner coils made from a high-temperature superconductor consisting of a combination of yttrium, barium, copper and oxygen. MagLab scientists, engineers, technicians and other staff worked to develop entirely new techniques for insulating, reinforcing and de-energizing the novel inner coils. These techniques were essential because of the unique and complex electromagnetic and mechanical aspects of this new material.

“The 32T superconducting magnet was built after many years of materials development, and NSF is proud to see the fruits of one its high-risk high-reward investments in research infrastructure being recognized as one the major R&D projects in the country,” said Sean Jones, who leads the NSF Mathematical and Physical Sciences Directorate, which funds and oversees the MagLab. “The achievement shows U.S. leadership in high-field magnet science and technology and represents a major milestone for democratizing access to high-magnetic fields essential for U.S. advances in quantum information science and engineering, the environment, and health research.”

After eight years of hard work, the 32T magnet reached full field in 2017, yielding a 36% increase in a single year and overtaking a record field that held for 50 years. The magnet was moved, modified, tested and commissioned before being opened in 2021, allowing researchers from around the world to conduct experiments to understand the physics of complex quantum materials.

“This magnet represents the hard work of many people at the lab and is a major accomplishment in magnet technology that provided a huge leap forward in the superconducting magnetic field available to researchers,” said MagLab Director Greg Boebinger. “Its performance marks the launch of a revolution in superconducting research magnets for high-field, low-temperature physics and chemistry and is an indicator of still higher fields to come with continued improvements in high-temperature superconducting materials and magnet technologies.”

Building off the lab’s demonstrated success of the 32T magnet, the NSF in October 2021 announced a new $15.8 million grant for a detailed design of a 40T all-superconducting magnet. Dozens of researchers within the lab’s Magnet Science and Technology department and Applied Superconductivity Center are now bringing their unique expertise in materials research, magnet design and technology development to this new project.

The 2022 R&D award winners were selected by 50 industry professionals from across the world; winners will be honored in November at a black-tie gala in San Diego.

Wednesday, September 7, 2022

FSU/LSU Draws 7.6 Million viewers

 








http://www.thetvratingsguide.com/2022/09/sunday-tv-ratings-9422-big-brother.html


Time

Show

18-49 Rating/Share

Viewers (mil)

Network

7 PMThe Conners (R)
0.52.60ABC

60 Minutes (R)0.34.84CBS

Password (R)0.21.81NBC

MLS Soccer0.10.34Fox
7:30 PMCollege Football: FL St v. LSU1.66.34ABC
8 PMBig Brother0.53.13CBS

Password (R)0.22.10NBC

World's Funniest Animals (R)0.10.56The CW

PBC Boxing0.10.37Fox
8:30 PMWorld's Funniest Animals (R)0.10.61The CW
9 PMThe Equalizer (R)0.22.03CBS

America's Got Talent (R)0.21.59NBC

Penn & Teller: Fool Us (R)0.10.45The CW

Bob's Burgers (R)0.10.44Fox
9:30 PMFamily Guy (R)0.20.54Fox
10 PMNCIS: Los Angeles (R)0.21.79CBS


Florida State College Football Victory Over LSU Ignites ABC Read more:

Sunday, September 4, 2022 Total Viewers:  ABC: 5.87 million, CBS: 2.95, NBC: 1.77, CW: 526,000 Fox: 398,000 Adults 18-49: ABC: 1.4 rating/15 share, CBS: 0.3/ 2, NBC: 0.2/ 2, Fox and CW: 0.1/ 1 each ABC: College Football (Ohio State Buckeyes 21, Fighting Irish 10) Fox: Baseball Night in America  Original Programming   ABC 7:00 p.m. NCAA College Basketball (Florida State 24, LSU 23) Viewers: 1.06 million (#3); Adults 18-49: 0.1 rating/1 share (#3) CBS 8:00 p.m. “Big Brother” Viewers: 3.13 million (#2); Adults 18-49: 0.5/ 5 (#2) Fox 7:00 p.m. Soccer Viewers: 336,000 (#4); Adults 18-49: 0.1/ 1 (#4) 8:00 p.m. Boxing Viewers: 584,000 (#4); Adults 18-49: 0.1/ 1 (#4t)


Read more: https://programminginsider.com/sunday-ratings-florida-state-college-football-victory-over-lsu-ignites-abc/






https://tvline.com/2022/09/05/tv-ratings-big-brother-24-vs-college-football/

In the latest TV ratings, ABC’s Labor Day Eve broadcast of the Florida State-LSU collegiate football match averaged 5.9 million total viewers and a 1.5 demo rating, dominating Sunday night in both measures.

Children’s Miracle Network presented a check for more than $700,000 to the FSU College of Medicine

 


Tuesday, September 6, 2022

The ACC is making more money than ever. So why is the league's future so uncertain?

 

The ACC is making more money than ever. So why is the league's future so uncertain?


The Atlantic Coast Conference set records in 2020 in revenue generation and distribution to its member institutions, indicators that are nearly as important as wins and losses in college athletics these days.

But it wasn’t enough to keep the Greensboro-based league from falling further behind two other major college athletic conferences in those key financial metrics—a revenue gap that is likely to grow significantly in coming years and threaten the future of the ACC, a conference as much a part of the fabric of North Carolina as Cheerwine and pulled pork.

The athletic conferences are nonprofit entities and file tax forms with the Internal Revenue Service that spell out their revenues and expenses, including distributions to member institutions. WRAL News analyzed two decades of tax records filed by the top five NCAA conferences, a period of enormous financial growth, movement of schools and increasing budgets, financed in large part due to skyrocketing television rights fees.

The financial and power chasm between the top two conferences and everyone else poses big questions and foretells big changes for college athletes, fans and academic institutions.

The ACC brought in about $84 million in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2001, distributing almost $8 million to each of its then-nine league members. Twenty years later, the league reported making $578.3 million in revenue during the 2020-21 fiscal year and distributed an average of $36.1 million to its 15 members, which included Notre Dame as a full member during the pandemic football season of 2020.

Two of its competitors, however, have grown even quicker.

The Southeastern Conference, with football powerhouses such as Alabama, Georgia and Florida, generated $833.3 million and distributed an average of $54.6 million to its 14 members in the 2020-21 fiscal year, the last year for which financial data is available.

The Big Ten, with football stalwarts Ohio State and Michigan and huge numbers of alumni from large Midwestern state schools, generated $679.8 million and distributed an average of $48.7 million to its 14 members in the 2020-21 fiscal year, even as the conference played an abbreviated football schedule.

The differences in those annual payouts, starting small and growing larger each year, is the revenue gap. About 37% of athletic department revenue across the FBS comes from conference distributions. The ACC is at 36%, but the Big Ten is at 50% and the SEC is at 61%, according to 2021 data from the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. Donor contributions make up 28% of ACC athletic department revenue.

The money is seen as critical for long-term financial health of the conferences, a key to stabilizing membership and keeping the most successful schools in the league. As the gap widens, at a minimum, it could mean better facilities, more recruiting muscle and more national exposure for the universities across their athletics programs. At a maximum, it could create a class of schools with huge influence over the future of college athletics.

And the chasm is only going to get bigger due to changes in membership: the SEC is adding powers Oklahoma and Texas from the Big 12 by 2025, and the Big Ten is expanding to California with the additions of USC and UCLA by 2024. Each league will have 16 members and, in the Big Ten’s case, television rights deals that could exceed $1 billion annually.

The moves, particularly the Los Angeles schools’ departure for the Big Ten announced this summer, set off a flurry of speculation about further consolidation involving marquee ACC teams and pushed the league’s revenue gap to the forefront.

“It’s economically impossible to address it,” said Karl Benson, who served as commissioner of the Mid-American, Western Athletic and Sun Belt conferences between 1990 and 2019. “When conferences don’t meet membership expectations, you get movement. What causes USC or UCLA or what causes Texas and Oklahoma to leave? When they recognize it ain’t going to get any better.”

The ACC is locked into its current rights agreement with ESPN until 2036 and, barring an unlikely move from Notre Dame to join the league in football, it lacks a clear addition to significantly alter its position.

It’s left the ACC member schools to ponder: Will it get any better?

“At the end of the day, it comes down to ratings and viewership,” said Tag Garson, senior vice president of properties at Wasserman and former programming director at ABC Sports and ESPN.

But each year moves the ACC closer to the end of its grant of rights agreement and each year may bring a larger revenue gap, changing the calculus for schools.

Several ACC schools could be coveted by the SEC or Big Ten, including Notre Dame, North Carolina, Florida State and Clemson. Other schools may be of interest to one or the other for different reasons. Some schools, perhaps more than half of the league, could end up remaining in a diminished ACC. The schools that help drive the revenue could push for unequal revenue distribution within the league.

The ramifications are not just financial. The ACC’s power could be diminished. The concentration of football powers in two leagues will allow the SEC and Big Ten to set the agenda at the highest level of college athletics at a time of massive disruptions. Everything from the structure of the college football playoff to the number of scholarships, from the shape of the NCAA Tournament to revenue sharing with athletes is on the table, and the Super 2 will be able to shape those discussions.

“We understand where those two leagues are,” Phillips said. “No one is ignoring that. We're all trying to find ways to close that gap.”


Thursday, September 1, 2022

Sports Illustrated’s Power 5 Desirability Ratings

 

Sports Illustrated’s Power 5 Desirability Ratings

Sports Illustrated’s Power 5 Desirability Ratings

Overall rankingSchoolFootball rankAcademicsAll sportsAttendanceViewershipTotal

1.

Ohio State

2

20(t)

4

3

2(t)

31

2.

Michigan

16

8

3

1

5(t)

33

3.

Notre Dame

6

5

8

16

2(t)

37

4.

Texas

12(t)

14

1

7

7(t)

41

5.

Georgia

3

19

18

8

5(t)

53

6. 

Florida

18

11(t)

5

12

12(t)

58

7.

Wisconsin

8

17

23

15

12(t)

75

8.

Oklahoma

5

52(t)

10

13

1

81

9.

USC

30

10

12

23(t)

9

84

10.

Alabama

1

55(t)

21

4

4

85

11.

Penn State

7

28(t)

41

2

10

88

12.

Texas A&M

12(t)

30(t)

24

5

18(t)

89

13.

Auburn

11

41(t)

31

11

12(t)

106

14.

LSU

14

62

16

6

11

109

15.

Washington

25

24(t)

27

19

16(t)

111

16.

Clemson

4

33(t)

58

14

7(t)

116

17.

Stanford

46(t)

1

2

54

24(t)

127

18.

UCLA

43

6

15

40(t)

28(t)

132

19.

Florida State

56

22(t)

14

21(t)

21(t)

134

20.

Michigan State

27

38(t)

39

18

15

137

21.

Iowa 

9

38(t)

52

20

21(t)

140

22.

(tie) N. Carolina

48(t)

11(t)

6

39

41(t)

145

22.

(tie) Oregon

20

41(t)

30

36

18(t)

145

24.

Tennessee

54

45(t)

13

9

28(t)

149

25.

(tie) Oklahoma St.

10

65(t)

22

30

24(t)

151

25.

(tie) Miami

23(t)

22(t)

48

34

24(t)

151