Thursday, June 23, 2016

FSU recruiting quality

Great Tomahawknation.com article.


http://www.tomahawknation.com/2016/6/22/11997702/2017-fsu-football-recruiting-noles-achieving-historic-quality-over-quantity

"So while the quantity for this year’s haul figures to be under the typical mean, at this point, the quality of those committed to Florida State for the 2017 cycle is staggering. Specifically, it’s better than it’s ever been in Fisher’s tenure with the garnet and gold.
That may not jump out at you if you rely strictly upon recruiting ranking, with regard to which, we use 247’s composite scores. FSU currently sits eighth, nationally, for 2017, but it’s important to note that every team currently ranked ahead of the ‘Noles has more commitments than Florida State, which has 10:
  1. Ohio State (13)
  2. Alabama (14)
  3. Oklahoma (15)
  4. Michigan (15)
  5. Georgia (11)
  6. Notre Dame (13)
  7. Tennessee (18)
But, simply put, most of those programs need to replace more than the Seminoles. Hence, quantity.
FSU, on the other hand, which returns the majority of its starters on both sides of the ball along with a good deal of depth, is in a position of being able to focus on its top targets. Ergo, quality. And so far, the returns are very promising. Presently, only Ohio State has a higher per-player ranking than Florida State, with regard to the 2017 cycle. The Buckeyes are at 94.48, while the Seminoles’ currently come in at 92.85.
How good is that number for the ‘Noles? Well, FSU’s stellar 2016 class finished second in the country, behind only Alabama— a Crimson Tide program that led the country at 92.85, exactly, to the hundredth of a point, where Florida State finds itself right now. That’s really saying something.
In fact, the current per-player rank of FSU recruits is as high as it’s ever been in the Jimbo Fisher era. Here’s a list of how the Seminoles’ recruiting classes have finished since Fisher took over, with the per-player average first, and each class’ final national ranking parenthesized:
  • 2016: 91.71 (2)
  • 2015: 92.41 (3)
  • 2014: 90.07 (4)
  • 2013: 89.19 (11)
  • 2012: 92.71 (3)
  • 2011: 90.41 (2)
  • 2010: 88.65 (7)
2010’s signing class, of course, can be rather misleading, as Fisher had only been at the helm for about a month after taking over for Bobby Bowden— and that really serves to illustrate what a change in leadership can spawn. Prior to 2011, the Seminoles hadn’t signed a 90+ average recruiting class since 2002, when Bowden brought in the country’s No. 2 class, which averaged 91.10. But to return to the present: if FSU can maintain anywhere near its 2017 80% blue-chip recruiting rank, this class looks to be in good shape to finish quite nicely. "

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

FSU State of Florida performance funding & State funding news



http://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2016/06/22/bog-committee-approves-millions-fsu-famu/86268382/

"Florida State University, which placed sixth in the rankings, will receive $35.6 million in performance-based funding, in addition to its $43.4 million investment, for a total of $79 million.
That’s in addition to the additional $10 million, the committee approved Tuesday to FSU as a preeminent institution."

"In its release, FSU said the money will be used to hire top professors in the STEM fields, along with student support services. It also will be invested in the university’s Center for Academic Retention and Enhancement program, which supports first-generation college students."

doug blackburn@dblackburn 2 minutes ago
FSU to receive total $79 million in performance funding next fiscal year; UF $97 million (not a typo) and FAMU $26 million.
 
Last year, UF was at $27 Million and FSU was $21 Million (USF $22 Million).
 
 
 
 
University Points State Allocation Institutional Allocation Total Performance Funding Allocation
University of Florida 82 $47,695,822 $49,180,011 $96,875,833
Florida State University 68 $35,574,608 $43,480,076 $79,054,684
University of Central Florida 84 $39,301,181 $38,697,580 $77,998,761
University of South Florida 79 $32,308,363 $39,487,999 $71,796,362
Florida International University 76 $25,253,750 $30,865,695 $56,119,445
Florida Atlantic University 84 $25,346,748 $21,642,163 $46,988,911
Florida Agricultural and Mechnical University 65 $11,509,132 $14,066,717 $25,575,849
Florida Gulf Coast University 67 $8,010,396 $9,790,484 $17,800,880
University of North Florida 56 $0 $12,914,791 $12,914,791
Unversity of West Florida 57 $0 $12,133,627 $12,133,627
New College of Florida 59 $0 $2,740,857 $2,740,857
Florida's public universities receive funding each year based on how they perform in 10 categories. The performance-based funding model uses
a 100-point scoring system. The Florida Board of Governors will consider how much funding the universities should get during meetings
scheduled for this week.
Proposed Performance-Based Funding for Florida's Public Universities
 
 
 
 
RankUniversityPoints/100
1FAU 84
1UCF84
3UF82
4USF79
5FIU76
6FSU68
7FGCU67
8FAMU65
9NCF59
10UWF57
11UNF56

How to improve the ACC?

Great article from Warchant.com, subscribe today.




https://floridastate.forums.rivals.com/threads/five-takes-five-ways-to-make-the-acc-a-better-conference.130719/


Five ways the ACC can be improved from an FSU perspective

1. Pressure the conference for a bigger piece of the pie

"ACC Commissioner John Swofford made it clear a long time ago that he is a strong proponent of equal revenue sharing within the conference. In fact, back in 2011, he called it “sacred." However, Swofford has already fudged from that promise by allowing Notre Dame to join the conference as a partial member. The Irish gain the benefits of being affiliated with a Power Five conference but don’t have to share the financial benefits from their huge television contract.

Since the door has been opened against the strict adherence to equal revenue sharing, there’s a case to be made for programs that drive the financial train to be rewarded accordingly. By Swofford’s own admission, football brings in about 80 percent of the revenue from the ACC’s television deal with ESPN. Considering that FSU and Clemson overwhelming carry the weight in football, shouldn’t those programs reap some extra benefits?"


2. Overhaul the ACC officiating crew


" Last year, Warchant.com published a story documenting officiating bias in the ACC based on an independent research project. Not surprisingly, the study showed underdogs tended to receive preferential treatment in the ACC. Again, this is consistent with the bizarre disparity in holding calls involving Florida State. But what makes no sense is the trend is exactly the opposite when it comes to men’s basketball. Basketball powers Duke and North Carolina frequently lead the conference in free-throw disparity, and many believe that the conference officials bend over backwards to protect the premier basketball programs."


3. Get away from the basketball- and Tobacco Road-centric mentality

"As for the basketball-first mentality, if you attend a conference football championship as a fan or media member, and then compare that to the treatment received during an ACC men’s basketball tournament, it’s hard not to notice a significant difference. The basketball tournament is a well-staffed event with little expense spared. The ACC support staff is incredibly accommodating, the food is top notch and the whole event runs smoothly thanks to careful planning.

The same can’t be said for the ACC football championship. It almost seems like a bother for the ACC to have to put on this event every year. It’s very clear, maybe more so for a media member attending, that football doesn’t generate the same focus from ACC personnel and that logistical problems are more frequent. The ACC football championship has been a decent event, but it’s clearly not getting the support it should from the conference compared to men’s basketball, considering that football is the cash cow."

4. Foster a better working relationship with ESPN to both feature and protect the top programs


"With that in mind, why doesn’t the ACC stand up for Florida State when it becomes clear that its TV network partner is stepping over the line in its coverage of one of its member schools? Swofford and the ACC did nothing through it all, from Heather Cox badgering Jameis Winston on the field after the ACC Championship, to Paul Finebaum flat out calling him a “rapist," to Darren Rovell concocting an autograph scandal that never existed during the week of a huge showdown with Notre Dame, to Mark Schlabach digging through thousands of police reports hoping to find any transgression, even slight, to pile on a program that had already taken blow after blow from ESPN.

Nobody is saying that Florida State or Jameis Winston was perfect during his time on campus. Some mistakes were made. But there was a massive disparity between what was being reported by ESPN and others compared to what actually happened. This should have been the perfect opportunity for the ACC to reach out to its television partner and say enough is enough. But there’s been no indication that was ever done, at least not publicly. And you come away with the strong impression that the ACC doesn’t have FSU’s back. If that’s the case, then why should FSU care about the conference?"

5. Develop a financially lucrative conference television network

 "The important focus here isn’t simply launching some sort of network -- because that’s happening, and probably sooner than you think. The key is having a network that results in a real monetary benefit to the member schools. The amount received by the schools must make a real dent in the growing financial disparity between the ACC and competing conferences. If not, the conference has failed in the promises it made when it convinced FSU to sign off on the Grant of Rights.

Launching a network for the sake of saying you have a conference network is meaningless without a real financial benefit behind it. And that’s the real fear if the ACC announces something later this year as expected. The new “network,” if that’s what it can truly be called, will likely be touted by the ACC as the greatest thing since sliced bread. I also expect the conference and certain writers/bloggers who push the company line to imply that all perceived financial shortcomings between the ACC and other Power Five schools will have been resolved."


"Just missed making the top five:
  • Realign the divisions -
  • Under no circumstances move to a nine-game conference slate. "However, a nine-game conference schedule would absolutely screw over the ACC's main powers Florida State and Clemson. Forcing an extra conference game on teams that have annual in-state clashes with out of conference opponents would drastically limit scheduling for those teams. Florida State and Clemson would have 10 games locked in every year (11 when Notre Dame slides into the rotation) and would handcuff those school's ability to schedule enough home games to meet budgets. The additional limitation could also hinder the scheduling of neutral site games like the FSU-Ole Miss game this year. It would all go back to No. 3 on the list since a nine-game conference schedule would be appease Tobacco Road but not the programs that carry the load for the conference. "

Conf Payout comparison

Just a refresher from a couple of solid poster.



http://csnbbs.com/thread-782488-page-8.html


"Then the ACC will have a huge $$ problem as the BIG will make 200M plus more a year starting in 2017-18 than the ACC and that is before someone adds the BIG TV T3 rights... Plus the bIG will get a new contract in 2025-26 with mo money!!! Craziness..

For 2014-15 (Before new BIG Contract!!)

SEC $32.7 million/school (ESPN/CBS owns TV T1 through T3 rights so what you see is what you get)

B1G $29.3 million/school (plus TV T3 rights for each school for true TV money per school)

ACC $26.2 million/school (ESPN owns TV T1 through T3 rights so what you see is what you get, however it does include UM exit $$)

Pac12 $25.1 million/school (plus TV T3 rights for each school for true TV money per school)

Big12 $23.3 million/school (plus TV T3 rights for each school for true TV money per school) "


"Just FYI, I think the Big Ten and Pac-12 both signed their T3 rights over to their respective conference networks (as the SEC did also). So the only conference where teams actually retain ANY TV rights is the Big XII. The difference is ACC tier 3 games currently end up on ESPN3, which pays next to nothing. THAT is a huge problem (the lack of a separate Tier 1 contract is the other problem)."

"SEC FY15 numbers:
Total revenue: $527.4 million
Percentage of revenue distributed to schools: 86.8
Distribution per school: $32.7 million
(Note: The revenue includes only nine months of income from the SEC Network.)
-- Jon Wilner May 19, 2016 "

Raycom paid $50 Million from ESPN, ACC sees none of the profit

But, John Swofford's son has a job.

It is insane there are still some FSU fans (and FSU leadership) that want to trust FSU football to John Swofford.


http://csnbbs.com/thread-782619.html

Raycom pays $50 million annually to ESPN; ACC schools see zero!
The problem with the current ESPN & ACC deal is that Commish packaged all of the T3 TV rights with T1 & 2 TV rights. Basically, ESPN owns them all. Unlike the new BIG deal that is split between FOX/ESPN and then CBS SPORTS Network (basketball only), ESPN owns them all!

Many ACC fans don’t understand that the 26M avg they’re getting for 2014-15 tax return doesn’t compare directly to other conf.. The ACC TV Money is set while the BIG12(or other P5 Conf) avg TV money must be added to TV T3 rights to get the true dollar amount (23.3M+T3 TV rights.) ACC conference members did retain their non-televised third tier media rights.

How much is Tier 3 rights worth?? CBS SPORTS NETWORK just paid 10M annually to the BIG just for left over Basketball games, FOX and ESPN also get Basketball games and then the rest go to CBS SPORTS NETWORK... Furthermore Raycom pays $50 million annually in a sublicense agreement with ESPN for 31 live football games and 60 live men’s basketball games; ACC schools see none of that money. Raycom sublicensed 17 of those football games and 25 of those basketball games to Fox, which carries the games on its regional sports networks and again the ACC schools do not see any of that money!!

This can all be forgiven if ESPN launches an ACC Network as we were told! Ready for the announcement!



LINK
http://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2...93ab48622b

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

ACC TV Ratings 2015




http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2016/06/20/Media/ESPN-Big-Ten.aspx


FYI

ACC #1 in TV Basketball Viewers - 2015 Nielsen

[​IMG]
The Nielsen ratings numbers for 2015 are out, and guess which conference was #1 in TV viewers? Yeah, trick question... the ACC had a 700k per game lead over the SEC and over a 1 million per game lead over the other power conferences. In fact, I have to figure that the SEC Network is the only thing which allowed the SEC to remain as close as they did - that constant hype paid off, I guess. Curious that the Big Ten didn't perform any better...

How do these ACC numbers compare to football?
The top ACC football games averaged 6.1 million viewers; the top games for the B1G and SEC averaged over 8 million. So, yes, there is a big difference between regular season viewership in football and basketball.*

What about combined viewers? Ah, that's where the ACC does far better than average...

Conf -
->Basketball---->Football---->Combined
SEC
------->2.3 M -------->8.1 M -------->10.4 M
B1G ------->1.6 M--------->8.5 M--------->10.1 M
ACC ------->3.0 M-------->6.1 M----------->9.1 M
XII
---------->1.4 M--------->5.0 M ---------->6.4 M
Pac--------->0.8 M-------->4.5 M----------->5.3 M

When you consider basketball and football combined, the ACC is right up there with the Big Ten and the SEC in terms of viewership.

* Note: these average viewership numbers are for the top 10 games only, so bad games on week nights had no effect on these averages, since those ratings were thrown out.

The issue for the SEC’s national viewership is that SEC powers like Alabama not drawing interest from major media markets. “SEC country is watching the Playoff regardless,” Barnett writes. “But they’re not breaking into the New York and Los Angeles markets like USC, Notre Dame and the Big Ten powers.”

Growth of Sports TV Advertising on Cable

Over the last 10 years, the media market has undergone a drastic transformation, which has positively affected sports on TV. There is an enormous amount of sports content to choose from and a shocking amount of hours viewed. In 2015, there were over 127,000 hours of sports programming available on broadcast and cable TV and 31+ billion hours spent viewing sports, which is up 160% and 41% respectively from 2005.
Cable TV networks have seen better results over the last five years in sports advertising -- up 8% to $4.1 billion.

ESPN takes the lion’s share with $2.4 billion, rising 6% over five years.

NFL Network is at $407.5 million (a gain of 34%).

Followed by ESPN2 at $362.3 million.

Golf Channel at $302.0 million (up 7%).

And NBC Sports at $200.0 million (up 14%).

[​IMG]

  • Sports accounted for 93 of the top 100 live viewed TV programs in 2015, compared to 14 in 2005. The amount of time spent on sports sites with a smartphone went up from 57 minutes in 2014 to 70 minutes in 2015. Streaming probably has an impact on that as well.
  • The College Football Playoff national title game, it was the third most watched sports broadcast of the year, trailing the Super Bowl and the NCAA men’s basketball tournament championship game.
  • According to Nielsen Scarborough, the highest percentage of college football fans lie in the Southeast and Midwest (SEC and BIG10). The SEC actually finished second in viewership by conference.

Monday, June 20, 2016

ACC Bowl Factoid



David HaleVerified account @DavidHaleESPN 4 minutes ago
ACC in bowls, last decade:
FSU 7-3
UL 5-2
Clem 5-5
VT 5-5
NCSU 3-3
Pitt 3-5
Cuse 3-0
WF 2-2
BC 2-5
GT 2-7
UNC 2-5
Mia 1-6
Duke 1-3
UVA 0-2



David Hale @DavidHaleESPN 11 minutes ago
Most bowl wins, last decade:
FSU
TCU
UGA
Boise St
Utah … all with 7.