Thursday, June 29, 2017

Revenue Gap article



http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/florida-gators/

Another day, another national championship for the Florida Gators.
Yawn.
This time, it was the baseball team. A couple of weeks ago, it was the dynastic track-and-field team. A couple of weeks before that, it was the women’s tennis team. Since 2010, the Gators have won 17 national championships in a multitude of sports.
Beware, Florida State. It’s only a matter of time before UF’s football team is paying, er, playing for national championships, too. Ditto, the basketball team.
You see, nobody in this part of the country buys, er, wins national championships like UF does.
This column is not meant so much to prop up the Gators for being an all-sports giant, although they certainly are. After coach Kevin O’Sullivan’s baseball team beat LSU 6-1 to win UF’s first College World Series championship Tuesday night, UF became the only program since integration that has baseball, football and basketball national championships in its trophy case.
This column is meant more as a warning for Florida State and its fellow ACC members. Beware of the Gators and their filthy rich Southeastern Conference brethren, who — with all of their SEC Network money — could be on the verge of spending you into irrelevance.
Granted, at this point in time, the ACC has never looked better with national championships in both football (Clemson beat SEC goliath Alabama) and basketball (North Carolina beat Gonzaga), but don’t kid yourself: The SEC is earning money and spending it at an alarming rate.
 
All you have to do is look at UF as an example. The Gators likely will announce soon they are getting ready to build a new baseball stadium and a new softball complex. This comes on the heels of totally refurbishing their basketball arena to the tune of $64.5 million and building a new football indoor-practice facility for close to $20 million.
And coming soon: Another $60 million for a stand-alone football Taj Mahal that surely will be filled with smoothie bars, waterfalls, laser-tag studios and all sorts of amenities to entice the recruits who don’t go to Alabama.
“I think the SEC Network and the money and exposure it has provided has been a huge factor,” says UF basketball coach Mike White, who took his team to within one victory of the Final Four in his second season. “The network is providing an incredible amount of money for our institutions to spend on facilities. When you look around the league, there are renovations everywhere.”
According to the most recent numbers, ACC revenues dropped during the 2015-16 fiscal year and the conference offered the lowest annual payout per school ($23.8 million) of any of the Power 5 conferences. Compare that to the SEC’s bowl and TV payout of $40.42 million and then do the math. If this massive discrepancy were to continue over a 10-year period, the Gators would make $160 million more than the Seminoles. That’s a lot of plush facilities to entice wide-eyed recruits.
And we’re just talking about bowl and TV revenue. In total earnings, the SEC averages $30 million per school more than the ACC. You simply cannot continue operating at such a financial deficit and expect to consistently compete.
If you really want to put it in perspective, think about it this way: The discrepancy between the SEC and ACC payouts is almost as large as the discrepancy between the ACC and the American Athletic Conference payouts. In other words, when it comes to financial comparisons, the Gators are to FSU what FSU is to UCF.
The hope, of course, is that when ESPN launches the ACC Network in 2019 that FSU and its league partners can begin to close the gap. But in this era of cord-cutting among viewers and budget-cutting at ESPN, the question is: How profitable will the ACC Network be?
Obviously, it’s not going to be as successful as the SEC Network, which, according to AL.com, has been valued at nearly $5 billion — four times more than even the highly successful Big Ten Network.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s not like the ACC is hurting for cash; it’s just that the SEC has it to burn.
The bottom line is the bottom line.
In sports as in politics, those contestants and candidates with the most money usually win.

5 comments:

  1. Has the Orlando Sentinel EVER written anything nice about FSU?

    For the foreseeable future, the Gators will have advantages in baseball, the Olympic sports, and maybe basketball... I think so much has already been spent on football at both schools that I just don't see how a few million more will matter that much in that sport.

    But I could definitely see them pulling ahead in the other sports (until / assuming the revenue gap finally shrinks after the ACCN is launched).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. $160 Million isn't just a 'few million' more. It is an issue. I don't get why folks want to deny it.

      If ACCN generates 80% of SECN, then all will be fine most likely. If not.....FSU better be prepared to settle in a major way.

      Delete
  2. How is 80% ok? If the acc pays out $35m once the accn actually happens, that means the sec is paying out $44m. And isn't the sec already pretty close to that amount now?

    I don't see a nearly $10m/yr gap as acceptable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Valid, can't argue against that. I think it's because I see something more like 70%. But yes, 90% plus might be more needed.

      Delete
    2. I say don't even use percentages. I think they're silly. Something like $3-5M should be the bare minimum gap. Even that is a large $30-50M deficit every decade.

      I'd rather the big12 and acc's best just create a new conference (when economically viable). That'd be more competitive than the acc apparently ever will be.

      Delete