Why the ACC should have uneven bowl revenue distribution.....

ACC in transition


seminole72

"You seem annoyed that I'm discussing unequal bowl revenue distribution. And you've gone from from predicting what the ACC will do to declaring that they will do nothing and that it is correct that they make no change and that anyone urging an opposite opinion is not of the real world, but throwing things against a message board that's not based on all the facts. Yet you say you don't have all the facts, so how can you possibly factually know that what I'm asking is just throwing crap against a wall? You don't know, but you're sure I couldn't know. I do know that an unequal distribution formula is used by the SEc and I haven't noticed their demise. Did I miss a headline or is that more insider knowledge? Raising the LHN in this context is at best disingenuous and at worse deliberate obfuscation. LHN has nothing directly to do w/ the Big 12 revenue distribution and I think you know that. Texas created it and its based on their brand power. ND does something similar w/ NBC and I don't see you pointing at them as destroyers of the ACC. In fact, if you could be just a little objective and remove yourself from your real world, you'd recognize that the ACC presently has unequal revenue distribution right now. Read the agreement w/ ND if you have doubts. The whole equal distribution is the only fair thing is completely dispelled by this fact.

You made a statement previously that the ACC would never consider an uneven distribution of bowl revenue. Swofford once said they would look at it. I asked you why you said that. You reply with instructions about the real world. But you don't want to argue? No. You just don't want the subject to come up because neither you nor anyone else seems to have a cogent explanation of why it is good in the SEC, but bad in the ACC; why its ok for ND, but not for any other school.       "